Please keep at least one language enabled. || కనీసం ఒక భాషను ఎంచుకోండి.
Question 1
ప్రశ్న 1
A water-supply pipeline tender is to be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder satisfying all mandatory requirements. Bidder P submits the lowest quoted price but offers pipes of a lower pressure class than specified and refuses to correct the deviation. Bidder Q offers the next-lowest price and meets all requirements. What is the appropriate evaluation decision?
Explanation:
The lowest quoted price does not automatically establish the successful bidder in public-works procurement. A bid must comply with the mandatory technical and commercial requirements stated in the tender documents. The pressure class of a water pipeline is an essential technical characteristic affecting its suitability for the intended service. Bidder P has expressly declined to provide the specified pressure class. Its offer therefore contains a substantive technical deviation and cannot ordinarily proceed as a responsive bid. Bidder Q may be considered for award after confirming its qualification, evaluated price and the required approval.
వివరణ:
Question 2
ప్రశ్న 2
During evaluation of a bridge-construction tender, one bidder proposes to omit a mandatory seismic restraint arrangement from the bearings without offering an approved equivalent. Which assessment is correct?
Explanation:
Substantive responsiveness is assessed against essential tender requirements rather than the number of affected items. A mandatory seismic restraint arrangement forms part of the specified bridge performance and safety requirements. Omitting it can materially alter the technical characteristics of the construction. The bidder has not offered an authorized equivalent satisfying the original requirement. Such a deviation should not be treated as a harmless clerical error merely to preserve a lower quotation. The bid should be evaluated in accordance with the published rules governing substantive deviations.
వివరణ:
Question 3
ప్రశ్న 3
During technical evaluation of an electronic tender, a bidder has omitted an attachment containing a previously issued registration certificate. The certificate existed before the bid-submission deadline, and the applicable tender procedure expressly permits the authority to request eligible historical shortfall documents without changing the bid's substance. What is the most appropriate action?
Explanation:
A missing supporting document does not always have the same significance as a substantive technical deviation. The question states that the certificate already existed before the submission deadline. It also states that the governing tender procedure permits requests for eligible historical shortfall documents. The authority may therefore seek the document through an authorized and recorded process. The clarification must not create a new qualification or unfairly change the bidder's competitive position. The tender's stated rules and the authenticity of the submitted evidence remain controlling considerations.
వివరణ:
Question 4
ప్రశ్న 4
A contractor bidding for a specialized sewage-treatment plant fails the required financial-capacity criterion. It asks the evaluation committee to count the turnover of its parent company, although the tender does not permit reliance on parent-company credentials. Which decision is appropriate?
Explanation:
Qualification criteria establish the minimum capability required to perform the construction contract. Financial capacity may be evaluated through turnover, financial resources or other disclosed measures. The question expressly states that parent-company credentials cannot be substituted for the bidder's own credentials. The committee must therefore apply the published qualification requirements as written. An unauthorized relaxation after submission could disadvantage competing contractors who complied with the criteria. The bidder should be treated as failing the requirement unless another expressly permitted and applicable basis establishes qualification.
వివరణ:
Question 5
ప్రశ్న 5
A two-envelope civil-works tender prescribes a minimum technical score of 80 marks out of 100 before a financial bid can be opened. Bidder P scores 72, Bidder Q scores 79, and Bidder R scores 84. All other mandatory requirements are satisfied. Which financial bid should proceed to opening under the specified criterion?
Explanation:
The tender establishes a mandatory minimum technical score of 80 marks. Bidder P has scored 72 marks and does not meet this threshold. Bidder Q has scored 79 marks and also fails the stated requirement. Bidder R has scored 84 marks and satisfies the technical-score condition. Consequently only R's financial bid qualifies for the next stage, assuming all other requirements are met. The prescribed threshold must not be relaxed selectively after the technical scores are known.
వివరణ:
Question 6
ప్రశ్న 6
For a single-stage, two-envelope tender involving construction of an elevated service reservoir, which evaluation procedure best preserves the integrity of the financial bids?
Explanation:
A two-envelope system separates technical assessment from financial comparison. The technical evaluation is completed according to the disclosed qualification and responsiveness criteria. The financial offers should remain protected until their authorized opening stage. This separation reduces the risk that quoted prices improperly influence technical judgments. Only the financial bids of bidders meeting the prescribed technical requirements proceed to evaluation. Appropriate records and electronic access controls support the integrity of the process.
వివరణ:
Question 7
ప్రశ్న 7
Three technically responsive bids are evaluated on a fully tax-inclusive basis, with no preferences or other adjustments. Bid P quotes Rs 82 lakh EXCLUDING a mandatory tax component of Rs 8 lakh. Bid Q quotes Rs 88 lakh INCLUDING all taxes. Bid R quotes Rs 89 lakh INCLUDING all taxes. Which bidder has the lowest evaluated price?
Explanation:
The stated evaluation method requires all prices to be compared on a tax-inclusive basis. Bid P's evaluated amount is Rs 82 lakh plus the mandatory Rs 8 lakh tax component. Its total evaluated price is therefore Rs 90 lakh. Bid Q's evaluated price remains Rs 88 lakh because its quotation already includes taxes. Bid R's evaluated price remains Rs 89 lakh for the same reason. Bid Q has the lowest evaluated price among the three responsive bidders.
వివరణ:
Question 8
ప్రశ్న 8
An item-rate tender for pipeline construction contains 800 m3 of excavation at a quoted unit rate of Rs 750 per m3 and 500 m of pipeline laying at Rs 1,400 per m. The bidder has entered a grand total of Rs 1,250,000. The tender expressly provides that quoted UNIT RATES govern the correction of item extensions and arithmetic totals. What is the corrected bid amount?
Explanation:
The excavation amount is calculated by multiplying its quantity by the quoted unit rate. This gives 800 x 750 = Rs 600,000. The pipeline-laying amount is 500 x 1,400 = Rs 700,000. Their correct sum is Rs 600,000 + Rs 700,000 = Rs 1,300,000. The bidder's written grand total of Rs 1,250,000 is inconsistent with the stated item rates. Because the tender expressly assigns precedence to the quoted unit rates, the corrected amount is Rs 1,300,000, subject to the prescribed correction and acceptance procedure.
వివరణ:
Question 9
ప్రశ్న 9
A responsive construction bid has a quoted financial amount of Rs 105 lakh. The bidder has submitted an UNCONDITIONAL discount of 4 percent applicable to the entire amount, and the tender expressly permits such discounts to be considered during evaluation. What is the net evaluated bid price before other adjustments?
Explanation:
The original quoted financial amount is Rs 105 lakh. The permitted unconditional discount is 4 percent of that amount. Its value is 105 x 0.04 = Rs 4.20 lakh. The adjusted financial amount is Rs 105 lakh minus Rs 4.20 lakh. Therefore the net evaluated price is Rs 100.80 lakh. The discount may be considered because its unconditional nature and treatment are expressly established by the tender.
వివరణ:
Question 10
ప్రశ్న 10
Two technically responsive bidders are being evaluated on the TOTAL COST TO THE BUYER. Bid A quotes a base amount of Rs 105 lakh, with separately applicable transportation charges of Rs 8 lakh and taxes of Rs 11 lakh. Bid B quotes a base amount of Rs 112 lakh, with transportation charges of Rs 4 lakh and taxes of Rs 6 lakh. All components are payable by the buyer, and there are no other adjustments. Which bid has the lower evaluated cost?
Explanation:
The evaluation rule requires comparison of the complete amount payable by the buyer. Bid A's evaluated cost is 105 + 8 + 11 = Rs 124 lakh. Bid B's evaluated cost is 112 + 4 + 6 = Rs 122 lakh. Bid B therefore has the lower total evaluated cost. The difference is Rs 124 lakh minus Rs 122 lakh, which equals Rs 2 lakh. Comparing the base quotations alone would give the wrong ranking because the associated charges differ.
వివరణ:
Question 11
ప్రశ్న 11
For a specialized works contract, the procuring authority has expressly authorized a Quality-cum-Cost-Based Selection (QCBS) procedure and disclosed weights of 30 percent for the normalized technical score and 70 percent for the normalized financial score. Both qualifying bids pass the technical threshold. Bid A has normalized scores of 95 technical and 80 financial, while Bid B has scores of 80 technical and 95 financial. Which bidder has the higher weighted combined score?
Explanation:
The question expressly authorizes QCBS rather than ordinary lowest-cost selection. Bid A's weighted score is 0.30 x 95 + 0.70 x 80. This gives 28.5 + 56 = 84.5 points. Bid B's weighted score is 0.30 x 80 + 0.70 x 95. This gives 24 + 66.5 = 90.5 points. Bid B has the higher combined score and ranks first under the specified QCBS evaluation method.
వివరణ:
Question 12
ప్రశ్న 12
A technically responsive contractor quotes a price substantially below other bids and the engineer's estimate for construction of a deep sewer. The price raises serious concerns about whether the specified work can be performed safely and completely. Which evaluation action is most appropriate?
Explanation:
An abnormally low bid raises concern about the bidder's capability to perform at the offered price. A low quotation is not, by itself, conclusive evidence that the bidder cannot deliver the work. The authority may seek a reasoned explanation covering methodology, resources, quantities, costs and contractual risks. The explanation should be evaluated against the stated construction requirements and programme. If the bidder fails to demonstrate credible performance capability, rejection may be justified under the applicable procedure. Arbitrary automatic rejection based only on an undeclared percentage threshold is not an appropriate substitute for evaluation.
వివరణ:
Question 13
ప్రశ్న 13
A member of the tender evaluation committee discovers that a close relative has a significant financial interest in one of the competing construction firms. Which action best satisfies impartiality and procurement-integrity requirements?
Explanation:
Tender evaluation must be conducted independently and impartially. A significant financial relationship with a bidder creates an actual or potential conflict of interest. The relationship should be disclosed promptly through the prescribed procedure. The affected official should not influence the evaluation or award decision. Appropriate replacement or reassignment preserves confidence in the procurement process. Recorded conflict management is preferable to relying on an unsupported assertion of personal neutrality.
వివరణ:
Question 14
ప్రశ్న 14
Which arrangement most directly supports authenticity, confidentiality and auditability in an approved ELECTRONIC tendering system for public works?
Explanation:
Electronic tendering relies on controls that establish the identity of authorized users and protect bid information. Prescribed digital authentication can support the authenticity of electronic submissions. Access permissions should prevent unauthorized viewing or alteration of protected bid contents. Submission timestamps and opening records provide an auditable account of the process. The portal should preserve financial-bid confidentiality until the authorized opening stage. Electronic processing promotes procurement integrity only when these procedural and technical controls are applied.
వివరణ:
Question 15
ప్రశ్న 15
An electronic civil-works tender closes at 15:00 hours. A bidder attempts to upload its offer at 15:06 hours, after the prescribed portal has closed submissions. There is no verified system-wide malfunction or formally authorized deadline extension. What is the appropriate treatment?
Explanation:
The submission deadline is an essential condition applying equally to all bidders. Electronic procurement systems record bids received within the authorized submission period. An upload attempted after closure does not ordinarily constitute a valid timely bid. Privately accepting such a bid would undermine equal treatment and procurement transparency. Verified portal-wide difficulties may require a separate authorized corrective procedure, but none is present in this question. The late attempt should therefore not be accepted as an ordinary timely submission.
వివరణ:
Question 16
ప్రశ్న 16
Following financial evaluation of a competitive water-supply works tender, an official proposes privately negotiating revised rates with a preferred contractor who is not the lowest evaluated responsive bidder. The published procedure contains no authorization for such negotiations. Which action is appropriate?
Explanation:
The selection of a construction contractor must follow the procurement method and evaluation criteria announced in advance. Unauthorized negotiations with a preferred unsuccessful bidder can undermine competitive fairness. Other bidders prepared their offers under the original tender conditions. Privately altering the commercial basis after evaluation may disadvantage those bidders. Any negotiation permitted by the governing procedure must follow the applicable authorization and safeguards. In the stated absence of such authority, the published evaluation and award process should be followed.
వివరణ:
Question 17
ప్రశ్న 17
At the opening of financial bids for an item-rate highway contract, Bidder P is announced as having the lowest QUOTED amount. What conclusion can properly be drawn at that stage?
Explanation:
Bid opening and final financial evaluation are distinct procurement activities. The quoted amount announced at opening is an important part of the bid record. However, arithmetic errors or applicable evaluated-price adjustments may affect the financial ranking. Mandatory technical and qualification compliance must also be established under the tender rules. The lowest announced quotation therefore does not necessarily become the lowest evaluated responsive bid. Award requires completion of the prescribed evaluation and authorization process.
వివరణ:
Question 18
ప్రశ్న 18
Which statement correctly distinguishes BID SECURITY from PERFORMANCE SECURITY during tender evaluation and contract award?
Explanation:
Bid security is associated with specified commitments made during the tendering and award process. It may protect the procuring entity against defaults covered by the bidding conditions. Performance security relates to obligations arising under the awarded construction contract. These instruments consequently address different risks and stages of procurement. Their forms, amounts, validity requirements and any permitted exemptions depend on the applicable provisions. Providing bid security does not automatically replace a separate prescribed performance-security requirement.
వివరణ:
Question 19
ప్రశ్న 19
Technical and financial evaluation of a public-works tender is almost complete, but the bids will expire before the required award approval can be obtained. What is the most appropriate response?
Explanation:
Bid validity establishes the period for which a tender remains available for acceptance under its stated terms. The procurement authority must account for this period when scheduling evaluation and approval. If additional time is needed, extension should be sought through the prescribed procedure. Bidders' responses and relevant bid-security validity requirements must also be considered. An extension request should not become an opportunity to permit selective changes to prices or technical commitments. Proper control of bid validity helps maintain the legal and procedural integrity of the award.
వివరణ:
Question 20
ప్రశ్న 20
After a public-works evaluation committee recommends the lowest evaluated responsive contractor for a pumping-station contract, what is the appropriate next stage under a system requiring approval by the competent authority?
Explanation:
The evaluation committee's recommendation is not necessarily the final contract-award authorization. The competent authority must review and approve the recommendation in accordance with the applicable procedure. The successful bidder is then formally notified through the prescribed method of acceptance. Performance security and contract-agreement formalities are completed as required by the tender documents. The legal effect of acceptance depends on the governing contractual conditions and applicable law. These steps establish a controlled transition from evaluation to contract execution.
వివరణ:
Question 21
ప్రశ్న 21
A bidder offers the lowest evaluated price for a roadworks contract but adds a condition stating that its offer is valid only if the employer deletes a mandatory contract clause concerning the contractor's essential obligations. The tender does not permit this exception. Which conclusion is most appropriate?
Explanation:
A tender offer must comply with essential commercial as well as technical requirements. The bidder has made its acceptance conditional upon removing a mandatory contractual obligation. This changes the rights or responsibilities specified by the employer. The exception is expressly prohibited by the tender conditions. Such a reservation cannot ordinarily be ignored merely because the quoted price is attractive. Responsiveness must be established before the offer is considered for final award.
వివరణ:
Question 22
ప్రశ్న 22
A highway tender expressly permits evaluation adjustments for completion time. The reference completion period is 15 months, and an evaluation loading of Rs 3 lakh is added for EACH month proposed beyond 15 months. Bid A is technically responsive and quotes Rs 98 lakh for 18 months. Bid B is technically responsive and quotes Rs 104 lakh for 15 months. Bid C quotes Rs 102 lakh for 15 months but fails a mandatory qualification requirement. There are no other adjustments. Which bid ranks first under the published lowest-evaluated-responsive-bid rule?
Explanation:
The published evaluation rule permits a completion-time adjustment for offers longer than 15 months. Bid A proposes 18 months and therefore exceeds the reference period by three months. Its evaluated price is Rs 98 lakh plus 3 x Rs 3 lakh, giving Rs 107 lakh. Bid B meets the reference period and retains an evaluated price of Rs 104 lakh. Bid C cannot be ranked for award because it fails a mandatory qualification requirement. Bid B is therefore the lowest evaluated responsive offer under the stated criteria.
వివరణ:
Question 23
ప్రశ్న 23
During evaluation of bids for a drainage project, the committee notices that several quotations contain unusually similar item-rate patterns and supporting documents. The available information raises suspicion of coordinated bidding but does not independently establish misconduct. What is the most appropriate response?
Explanation:
Collusive bidding can distort competition and undermine value for public expenditure. Unusual similarities in quotations may justify closer examination. However, similarity alone does not necessarily establish that the bidders have engaged in prohibited coordination. The committee should preserve relevant records and document the specific reasons for concern. Authorized procurement-integrity or investigative mechanisms can then assess the matter in accordance with the governing rules. A defensible decision requires evidence and due process rather than either automatic condemnation or deliberate disregard.
వివరణ:
Question 24
ప్రశ్న 24
During evaluation of an item-rate tender, the committee finds that one responsive bidder has quoted an exceptionally high rate for a relatively small BOQ item and a very low rate for another item. The tender contains no automatic disqualification rule based solely on an unbalanced distribution of item rates. Which action is most appropriate?
Explanation:
Unbalanced item rates can create financial and contract-management risks even when the overall bid amount appears competitive. An unusually high rate may become significant if the corresponding executed quantity increases. A very low rate elsewhere may reflect different pricing assumptions or allocation of overheads. The evaluation committee should examine the implications using the applicable tender provisions and available information. It must not invent a new automatic rejection rule after bids have been submitted. Any clarification or action must preserve responsiveness requirements, equal treatment and the published evaluation basis.
వివరణ:
Question 25
ప్రశ్న 25
Which set of records most directly supports a transparent and auditable recommendation for awarding a public Civil Engineering works contract?
Explanation:
Public-works procurement must provide a clear basis for explaining and reviewing the award decision. Bid-opening records establish the offers received through the prescribed process. Responsiveness and qualification findings show why particular bids were retained or excluded. Financial comparisons and recorded adjustments demonstrate how the evaluated ranking was established. Committee recommendations and the required approval identify the responsible decision-making stages. Maintaining these records supports accountability, consistency and subsequent audit.
వివరణ:
Answer Key సమాధానాల పట్టిక
-
Question 1 ప్రశ్న 1Answer: B. Treat P as substantively nonresponsive and consider Q for award after completing the prescribed evaluation and approval. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 2 ప్రశ్న 2Answer: D. The omission constitutes a substantive technical deviation because it changes an essential requirement of the proposed work. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 3 ప్రశ్న 3Answer: A. Request the permitted pre-existing supporting document through the controlled clarification procedure, without allowing any change to the substantive offer. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 4 ప్రశ్న 4Answer: C. Assess the bidder against the published qualification criteria without substituting unpermitted parent-company credentials. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 5 ప్రశ్న 5Answer: B. Only the financial bid of R. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 6 ప్రశ్న 6Answer: D. Complete the prescribed techno-commercial evaluation and open only the financial bids of technically successful bidders under the authorized procedure. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 7 ప్రశ్న 7Answer: A. Bid Q at Rs 88 lakh. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 8 ప్రశ్న 8Answer: C. Rs 1,300,000. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 9 ప్రశ్న 9Answer: B. Rs 100.80 lakh. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 10 ప్రశ్న 10Answer: D. Bid B at Rs 122 lakh, which is Rs 2 lakh lower than Bid A. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 11 ప్రశ్న 11Answer: A. Bid B with 90.5 points. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 12 ప్రశ్న 12Answer: C. Seek and assess an appropriate written price analysis and evidence of capability, then make a reasoned decision under the applicable abnormal-low-bid procedure. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 13 ప్రశ్న 13Answer: B. Disclose the conflict promptly and refrain from participating in the affected evaluation and decision process as required by the applicable rules. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 14 ప్రశ్న 14Answer: D. Using prescribed electronic authentication, role-based access, protected bid storage and traceable submission and opening records. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 15 ప్రశ్న 15Answer: A. Treat the attempted upload as late and do not accept it as a valid timely submission. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 16 ప్రశ్న 16Answer: C. Follow the published selection and approval rules rather than conducting unauthorized negotiations that alter the competitive outcome. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 17 ప్రశ్న 17Answer: B. P has the lowest announced quotation, but final ranking still depends on the required responsiveness checks, arithmetic corrections and prescribed financial evaluation. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 18 ప్రశ్న 18Answer: D. Bid security addresses specified bidder obligations during procurement, while performance security supports the successful contractor's obligations under the awarded contract. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 19 ప్రశ్న 19Answer: A. Seek an extension of bid validity through the prescribed procedure, addressing bidder consent and associated security requirements where applicable. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 20 ప్రశ్న 20Answer: C. Obtain the required award approval, communicate acceptance through the prescribed Letter of Acceptance or equivalent process, and complete applicable security and agreement requirements. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 21 ప్రశ్న 21Answer: B. The bid contains a substantive commercial reservation and should be assessed as nonresponsive under the published requirements. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 22 ప్రశ్న 22Answer: D. Bid B at an evaluated price of Rs 104 lakh. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 23 ప్రశ్న 23Answer: A. Document the indicators, protect the evidence and refer the matter for examination through the prescribed procurement-integrity and investigative procedures before making an unsupported conclusion. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 24 ప్రశ్న 24Answer: C. Examine the pricing risks and relevant quantities under the published evaluation and contract provisions, without inventing an undisclosed disqualification criterion. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 25 ప్రశ్న 25Answer: B. A documented record of bid receipt and opening, responsiveness and qualification findings, evaluated prices and adjustments, committee recommendations and required approval. సమాధానం: B.
