Please keep at least one language enabled. || కనీసం ఒక భాషను ఎంచుకోండి.
Question 1
ప్రశ్న 1
Which principle is most important when planning a rain-gauge network for a catchment?
Explanation:
A precipitation network is intended to characterize rainfall over an area rather than merely at one convenient location. Its design therefore depends on the purpose of the data, such as flood forecasting, water-resources assessment or rainfall-runoff modeling. Topography, climatic variability and the spatial pattern of rainfall also influence the number and placement of gauges. Accessibility, operation and maintenance costs must also be considered. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 2
ప్రశ్న 2
In a mountainous basin with strong orographic rainfall, which station-placement strategy is generally most appropriate?
Explanation:
Mountain precipitation can vary strongly with elevation and exposure to moisture-bearing winds. Windward slopes may receive much more precipitation than leeward rain-shadow areas. A representative network must therefore sample the important physiographic and climatic zones of the basin. Accessibility is relevant, but it should not be the only criterion controlling location. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 3
ప్రశ్న 3
A 2400 km² catchment is monitored by six rain gauges. If network density is expressed as catchment area represented per station, what are the present density and the density after two additional gauges are installed?
Explanation:
Area represented per station is obtained by dividing catchment area by the number of gauges. With six stations, the value is 2400/6 = 400 km² per station. After two gauges are added, there are eight stations. The new value is 2400/8 = 300 km² per station. A smaller area per station represents a denser network, so Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 4
ప్రశ్న 4
In the traditional statistical adequacy criterion for a rain-gauge network, which expression gives the required number of stations N when Cv is the coefficient of variation of station rainfall values in percent and e is the allowable percentage error in estimated basin mean rainfall?
Explanation:
The traditional network-adequacy relationship is N = (Cv/e)^2. The coefficient of variation represents spatial variability among the rainfall observations used in the analysis. The allowable error represents the desired precision in estimating the basin mean rainfall. Greater variability or a smaller allowable error therefore requires more stations. Hence Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 5
ప్రశ్న 5
According to N = (Cv/e)^2, if the allowable percentage error is reduced from 10% to 5% while Cv remains unchanged, how does the required number of gauges change?
Explanation:
The required number of gauges varies inversely with the square of the allowable error. Reducing e from 10 to 5 divides the denominator by two. Squaring this change increases N by a factor of four. This demonstrates why demanding much greater precision can rapidly increase network size and cost. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 6
ప్రశ్న 6
A catchment has six operating rain gauges. The coefficient of variation of the relevant rainfall values is 30%, and an allowable error of 10% is specified. Using N = (Cv/e)^2, how many gauges are required in total and how many additional gauges are needed?
Explanation:
The optimum number from the stated criterion is N = (30/10)^2. This is 3^2 = 9 stations. Since six gauges already exist, the additional number required is 9 - 6 = 3. The calculation assesses statistical adequacy but does not by itself determine the best locations for the three new gauges. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 7
ప్రశ్న 7
Three existing stations record comparable-period rainfalls of 80, 100 and 120 mm. Using the sample standard deviation, the mean is 100 mm and the standard deviation is 20 mm. For an allowable error of 10%, what does the traditional adequacy criterion indicate?
Explanation:
The coefficient of variation is Cv = 100s/Pmean. With s = 20 mm and mean rainfall = 100 mm, Cv equals 20 percent. The required number is therefore N = (20/10)^2 = 4. Since only three stations presently exist, the criterion indicates one additional station. Hence Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 8
ప్రశ్న 8
For an existing network of m gauges, the relation N = (Cv/e)^2 may be rearranged to estimate the percentage error associated with m stations as e = Cv/sqrt(m). If Cv = 24% and m = 9, what is the estimated error?
Explanation:
The stated rearrangement is e = Cv/sqrt(m). The square root of nine is three. Therefore e = 24/3 = 8 percent. This is the statistical error estimate associated with the assumptions of the adequacy relation. Thus Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 9
ప్రశ్న 9
Under which condition is the arithmetic-mean method most appropriate for estimating mean areal rainfall over a catchment?
Explanation:
The arithmetic-mean method assigns equal weight to every rain-gauge observation. It therefore works best when the stations are reasonably uniformly distributed over the catchment. Rainfall values should also not vary greatly from one station to another. If spacing is highly irregular or strong spatial gradients occur, equal weighting can become unrepresentative. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 10
ప్రశ్న 10
Four representative rain gauges record storm depths of 80, 100, 120 and 100 mm. Using the arithmetic-mean method, what is the mean areal rainfall?
Explanation:
The arithmetic mean assigns equal weight to all four station values. Their sum is 80 + 100 + 120 + 100 = 400 mm. Dividing by four gives 100 mm. The calculation is appropriate only when equal weighting is considered representative of the catchment. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 11
ప్రశ్న 11
What is the fundamental basis of the Thiessen-polygon method for estimating catchment-average rainfall?
Explanation:
Thiessen polygons divide the basin according to proximity to the available rain gauges. The region assigned to a gauge consists of points closer to that gauge than to any other gauge in the network. The fraction of total catchment area represented by that polygon becomes the station weight. Mean rainfall is obtained by summing the products of station rainfall and area weight. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 12
ప్రశ్న 12
Three gauges record 80, 100 and 140 mm of rainfall. Their Thiessen area weights are 0.20, 0.30 and 0.50 respectively. What is the Thiessen-weighted catchment rainfall?
Explanation:
The Thiessen estimate is the sum of each rainfall multiplied by its area weight. Thus P = 0.20(80) + 0.30(100) + 0.50(140). The three contributions are 16, 30 and 70 mm. Their total is 116 mm. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 13
ప్రశ్న 13
Which statement concerning Thiessen weights is correct?
Explanation:
Thiessen weights are based primarily on the geometry of gauge locations and the catchment boundary. For a fixed network, these polygon areas do not change merely because a different storm occurs. The normalized area fractions should sum to one. If gauges are added, removed or relocated, the polygons and weights generally need to be reconstructed. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 14
ప్రశ్న 14
What is an important limitation of the Thiessen-polygon method in a mountainous basin?
Explanation:
Thiessen weighting is based mainly on proximity and polygon area. It does not explicitly model rainfall changes caused by elevation, slope exposure or storm orientation. In mountainous terrain, these factors can strongly influence precipitation independently of distance to the nearest gauge. An isohyetal or more advanced spatial method may therefore represent such gradients better when sufficient information exists. Hence Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 15
ప్రశ్న 15
Which procedure best describes the isohyetal method of estimating mean areal rainfall?
Explanation:
Isohyets are lines joining points of equal rainfall depth. The catchment is divided into belts or zones between successive isohyets. A representative rainfall, commonly the average of the two bounding isohyet values, is assigned to each zone. This value is multiplied by the zone area and the resulting rainfall volumes are summed and divided by total catchment area. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 16
ప్రశ్న 16
An isohyetal analysis divides a 100 km² catchment into three zones: 20 km² between 0 and 50 mm, 30 km² between 50 and 100 mm, and 50 km² between 100 and 150 mm. Using the arithmetic mean of bounding isohyets for each zone, what is the mean areal rainfall?
Explanation:
The representative rainfall depths for the three zones are 25, 75 and 125 mm. The corresponding rainfall-area products are 20×25 = 500, 30×75 = 2250 and 50×125 = 6250 km²-mm. Their total is 9000 km²-mm. Dividing by the catchment area of 100 km² gives 90 mm. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 17
ప్రశ్న 17
Which method is generally most capable of incorporating a known strong spatial rainfall gradient caused by topography, provided sufficient station data and hydrological judgment are available?
Explanation:
The isohyetal method explicitly represents spatial variation through rainfall contours. When drawing the isohyets, the analyst can consider station spacing, observed rainfall variation, terrain and known orographic influences. The arithmetic mean method cannot represent such gradients explicitly. Thiessen weighting handles irregular spacing but is still primarily proximity based. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 18
ప్రశ్న 18
A rainfall value is missing at one station for a particular storm. When nearby stations have similar long-term normal precipitation and lie in the same rainfall regime, which simple estimation approach is reasonable at introductory engineering-hydrology level?
Explanation:
If nearby stations are climatologically similar to the station with missing data, equal weighting may provide a reasonable simple estimate. Traditional engineering-hydrology practice often uses arithmetic averaging when the normal rainfall values of the selected stations are sufficiently close to that of the missing station. When normal rainfalls differ materially, a normal-ratio method is more appropriate. Station selection should also reflect spatial representativeness rather than convenience alone. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 19
ప్రశ్న 19
Rainfall at a station is missing for a storm. Three climatologically similar neighbouring stations record 40, 46 and 44 mm. Using the simple arithmetic-average estimate, what is the missing rainfall?
Explanation:
The simple estimate is the arithmetic mean of the three representative neighbouring observations. Their total is 40 + 46 + 44 = 130 mm. Dividing by three gives 43.333 mm. Rounded appropriately, the estimated missing rainfall is 43.3 mm. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 20
ప్రశ్న 20
Why is the normal-ratio method useful for estimating missing rainfall when neighbouring stations have substantially different normal precipitation?
Explanation:
Stations in the same general region can still have different normal rainfall because of location, elevation or exposure. Direct averaging may therefore bias a missing value when their climatological means differ substantially. The normal-ratio method scales each neighbouring observation according to the relative normal precipitation of the target and neighbouring stations. The scaled contributions are then averaged. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 21
ప్రశ్న 21
The normal annual precipitation at a station with missing storm rainfall is 1000 mm. Three neighbouring stations have normal annual precipitation of 800, 1000 and 1250 mm and record storm depths of 48, 55 and 70 mm respectively. Using the normal-ratio estimate Px = (1/3)Σ[(Nx/Ni)Pi], what is the missing rainfall?
Explanation:
The first scaled value is (1000/800)×48 = 60 mm. The second is (1000/1000)×55 = 55 mm. The third is (1000/1250)×70 = 56 mm. Their average is (60 + 55 + 56)/3 = 57 mm. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 22
ప్రశ్న 22
What is the principal purpose of a double-mass curve in rainfall-data analysis?
Explanation:
A double-mass analysis compares accumulated rainfall at the station being tested with accumulated rainfall of one or more nearby reference stations. If the relation between the two records remains stable, the cumulative plot tends to follow a consistent slope. A persistent change in slope indicates that the relationship has changed. Such a change can result from station relocation, instrument changes, altered exposure or observation problems. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 23
ప్రశ్న 23
Which change is most likely to create an artificial break in the slope of a rainfall double-mass curve?
Explanation:
Double-mass analysis is concerned with changes in the relative relationship between the test station and a stable reference group. Moving a station can change its exposure, elevation or local wind environment and thereby alter its recorded rainfall systematically. Similar regional climatic variations generally affect both the test and reference records and do not necessarily create a persistent slope break. Instrument replacement or major environmental changes around the gauge can produce effects similar to relocation. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 24
ప్రశ్న 24
In a double-mass plot with cumulative reference rainfall on the x-axis and cumulative rainfall at the test station on the y-axis, an inconsistent segment has slope 0.75 but should be adjusted to a reference-consistent slope of 0.90. What correction factor should be applied to rainfall values in that segment, and what does an observed 800 mm become?
Explanation:
The required correction factor is the desired slope divided by the observed slope for the segment being corrected. Thus the factor is 0.90/0.75 = 1.20. Applying this factor to 800 mm gives 800×1.20 = 960 mm. The direction of correction must always be defined with respect to which segment is considered consistent and which segment is being adjusted. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 25
ప్రశ్న 25
A double-mass curve of cumulative rainfall at a test station against cumulative mean rainfall of stable neighbouring stations remains approximately a straight line with unchanged slope over the complete record. What is the most appropriate interpretation?
Explanation:
A stable double-mass slope indicates that the long-term proportional relationship between the test station and reference group has remained approximately unchanged. This supports the conclusion that no major systematic inconsistency is evident from the double-mass analysis. It does not imply that annual values are identical at all stations. It also does not prove the absence of individual random errors or isolated bad observations. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 26
ప్రశ్న 26
Consider the following statements about rain-gauge network design and rainfall analysis: I. Increasing spatial rainfall variability generally increases the number of gauges needed for a specified statistical accuracy. II. Thiessen weights are based on areas represented by individual gauges. III. Isohyetal analysis can explicitly represent spatial rainfall gradients through contours of equal precipitation. IV. A persistent change in double-mass-curve slope can indicate inconsistency in a station record. Which option is correct?
Explanation:
Statement I is correct because the traditional adequacy relation contains the coefficient of variation in its numerator. Statement II correctly describes the area-weighting basis of Thiessen polygons. Statement III correctly identifies the spatial-contouring basis of the isohyetal method. Statement IV correctly describes the primary diagnostic interpretation of a persistent break in a double-mass curve. Therefore all four statements are correct and Option D is the valid answer.
వివరణ:
Answer Key సమాధానాల పట్టిక
-
Question 1 ప్రశ్న 1Answer: B. The network should represent the important spatial variability of precipitation while satisfying the intended hydrological purpose at reasonable cost సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 2 ప్రశ్న 2Answer: B. Distribute gauges so that important elevation zones, windward and leeward areas, and major rainfall gradients are represented సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 3 ప్రశ్న 3Answer: A. 400 km²/station and 300 km²/station సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 4 ప్రశ్న 4Answer: B. N = (Cv/e)^2 సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 5 ప్రశ్న 5Answer: C. It becomes four times as large సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 6 ప్రశ్న 6Answer: B. 9 total; 3 additional gauges సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 7 ప్రశ్న 7Answer: B. Cv = 20%, N = 4, so one additional station is indicated సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 8 ప్రశ్న 8Answer: B. 8% సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 9 ప్రశ్న 9Answer: A. Gauges are reasonably uniformly distributed and their rainfall values do not show large spatial variation సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 10 ప్రశ్న 10Answer: B. 100 mm సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 11 ప్రశ్న 11Answer: B. Each station is weighted according to the catchment area closer to that station than to any other station సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 12 ప్రశ్న 12Answer: C. 116 mm సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 13 ప్రశ్న 13Answer: A. For a fixed network and catchment boundary, the area weights are determined by station geometry and normally sum to unity సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 14 ప్రశ్న 14Answer: A. It does not explicitly account for rainfall variation caused by topography or orographic effects సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 15 ప్రశ్న 15Answer: A. Draw contours of equal rainfall, determine the areas between successive isohyets, assign each zone a representative rainfall, and compute an area-weighted average సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 16 ప్రశ్న 16Answer: B. 90 mm సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 17 ప్రశ్న 17Answer: B. Isohyetal method సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 18 ప్రశ్న 18Answer: A. Use the arithmetic mean of rainfall at representative neighbouring stations సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 19 ప్రశ్న 19Answer: B. 43.3 mm సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 20 ప్రశ్న 20Answer: A. It adjusts each neighbouring event rainfall according to the ratio of the missing station's normal rainfall to the neighbour's normal rainfall సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 21 ప్రశ్న 21Answer: B. 57 mm సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 22 ప్రశ్న 22Answer: A. To detect changes in the consistency of a station record by comparing its cumulative rainfall with cumulative rainfall of a stable reference group సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 23 ప్రశ్న 23Answer: A. Relocation of the test rain gauge to a site with different exposure సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 24 ప్రశ్న 24Answer: B. 1.20; 960 mm సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 25 ప్రశ్న 25Answer: A. The test record is broadly consistent relative to the reference group over that period సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 26 ప్రశ్న 26Answer: D. I, II, III and IV సమాధానం: D.
