Please keep at least one language enabled. || కనీసం ఒక భాషను ఎంచుకోండి.
Question 1
ప్రశ్న 1
Why are indicator organisms commonly used in the bacteriological assessment of drinking water instead of attempting to test routinely for every possible waterborne pathogen?
Explanation:
A contaminated water supply can potentially contain many different pathogenic bacteria, viruses and protozoa. Routine testing for every possible pathogen would be complex, expensive and impractical for normal surveillance. Indicator organisms are therefore used because their occurrence can reveal faecal contamination or deficiencies in treatment and distribution integrity. An indicator result is interpreted as evidence about microbiological safety rather than as a complete inventory of pathogens. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 2
ప్రశ్న 2
Which organism is regarded as the most specific commonly used bacterial indicator of recent faecal contamination in drinking water?
Explanation:
Escherichia coli is strongly associated with the intestinal tract of humans and other warm-blooded animals. Its detection in drinking water therefore provides strong evidence of faecal contamination. Total coliforms form a broader group and can include organisms that are not specifically of faecal origin. E. coli is consequently more specific for assessing recent faecal pollution than the general total-coliform group. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 3
ప్రశ్న 3
Which statement best distinguishes total coliform bacteria from E. coli in drinking-water interpretation?
Explanation:
Total coliforms comprise a broader group of bacteria with environmental as well as possible faecal origins. Their occurrence in treated distributed water can indicate treatment deficiencies, contamination or loss of distribution-system integrity. E. coli is a member of the coliform group but is much more specifically associated with faecal material. Detection of E. coli consequently carries a stronger implication of faecal contamination and possible enteric pathogens. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 4
ప్రశ్న 4
What is meant by thermotolerant coliform bacteria in traditional water-quality terminology?
Explanation:
Thermotolerant coliforms are a subgroup of coliform bacteria detected under specified elevated incubation-temperature conditions. They have historically been referred to as faecal coliforms because of their stronger association with faecal sources than total coliforms generally. E. coli provides a still more specific indicator of faecal contamination. Modern drinking-water assessment therefore often emphasizes E. coli alongside the broader coliform indicators. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 5
ప్రశ్న 5
Under the current bacteriological requirement applied with IS 10500, what is the requirement for E. coli or thermotolerant coliform bacteria in water intended for drinking?
Explanation:
The current bacteriological requirement is based on non-detection rather than on permitting a small routine E. coli count. E. coli or thermotolerant coliform bacteria shall not be detectable in a 100 mL drinking-water sample. Their detection indicates unacceptable microbiological contamination and requires investigation and corrective action. Compliance with physical or chemical parameters cannot compensate for failure of this bacteriological requirement. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 6
ప్రశ్న 6
For treated water entering the distribution system, what is the current requirement for total coliform bacteria under the IS 10500 bacteriological framework?
Explanation:
Treated water entering the distribution system is expected to meet stringent bacteriological requirements. Total coliform bacteria shall not be detectable in the specified 100 mL sample. Their presence can indicate incomplete treatment, contamination after treatment or deficiencies in the treatment-to-distribution interface. This requirement must be distinguished from obsolete textbook formulations that allowed specified routine counts. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 7
ప్రశ్న 7
A 100 mL sample of treated drinking water is found to contain confirmed E. coli. Which interpretation is correct?
Explanation:
The applicable criterion requires E. coli not to be detectable in the 100 mL sample. Any confirmed detection therefore represents bacteriological non-compliance. Because E. coli is a specific indicator of faecal contamination, its presence requires prompt investigation of source, treatment and distribution conditions. Chemical parameters such as hardness do not override microbiological failure. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 8
ప్రశ్న 8
Which statement correctly interprets a result in which no E. coli is detected in a 100 mL drinking-water sample?
Explanation:
Non-detection of E. coli is an important favourable result for faecal contamination assessment. However, microbiological indicators are surrogate measures and do not constitute direct testing for every possible pathogen. Sampling also represents only a limited portion of a water system at a particular time. Overall safety therefore depends on treatment, disinfection, sanitary integrity and continuing monitoring as well as individual indicator tests. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 9
ప్రశ్న 9
What is the principal significance of detecting total coliform bacteria in treated water within a distribution system when E. coli is not detected?
Explanation:
Total coliforms are less specific for faecal contamination than E. coli. Nevertheless, they are useful indicators of the sanitary and operational integrity of treated-water systems. Their detection can result from intrusion, biofilm-related regrowth, inadequate disinfection or contamination during storage and distribution. The absence of E. coli makes direct evidence of faecal contamination less specific, but the total-coliform result still requires attention. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 10
ప్రశ్న 10
What is the basic principle of the membrane-filtration method used for detecting and enumerating E. coli and coliform bacteria in suitable drinking-water samples?
Explanation:
In membrane filtration, a known volume of water is passed through a membrane with pores small enough to retain target bacteria. The membrane is then transferred to an appropriate culture medium and incubated under specified conditions. Characteristic colonies are detected or counted according to the prescribed method. Because the tested volume is known, the bacterial result can be related to a standard volume such as 100 mL. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 11
ప్రశ్న 11
Which current Indian Standard specifically covers membrane-filtration detection and enumeration of E. coli and coliform bacteria in water with low bacterial background flora?
Explanation:
IS 15185:2016 is the Indian Standard corresponding to the membrane-filtration method for E. coli and coliform bacteria in water with low bacterial background flora. It is based on ISO 9308-1:2014 and is particularly relevant to drinking-water microbiological examination. BIS records show that this standard was reviewed in 2026. Structural concrete standards such as IS 456 and IS 1343 are unrelated to microbiological water testing. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 12
ప్రశ్న 12
Why is membrane filtration particularly suitable for disinfected drinking water or other waters with relatively low bacterial background populations?
Explanation:
Drinking water normally contains relatively low numbers of bacteria after effective treatment and disinfection. Membrane filtration allows a substantial measured volume to be passed through the filter and concentrates microorganisms onto a small membrane area. The retained organisms can then be cultured and enumerated on a suitable differential medium. Excessive background growth or high turbidity can interfere with reliable membrane examination, which is why the method is especially appropriate for low-background water. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 13
ప్రశ్న 13
A laboratory filters exactly 100 mL of treated drinking water and confirms three E. coli colonies on the membrane. What result and compliance interpretation follow?
Explanation:
The entire filtered volume is 100 mL, which is the reporting reference volume in the question. Three confirmed colonies therefore correspond to 3 colony-forming units per 100 mL. The current E. coli criterion requires non-detection in the 100 mL drinking-water sample. A result of 3 CFU/100 mL therefore represents microbiological non-compliance. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 14
ప్రశ్న 14
A 50 mL water sample yields two confirmed E. coli colonies by membrane filtration. Assuming proportional reporting and no dilution, what is the equivalent result per 100 mL?
Explanation:
Two confirmed colonies were recovered from only 50 mL of sample. Reporting the equivalent count per 100 mL requires multiplication by 100/50, which equals two. The equivalent result is therefore 2 × 2 = 4 CFU/100 mL. Because any confirmed E. coli detection is unacceptable for drinking water, this result would fail the bacteriological criterion. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 15
ప్రశ్న 15
What does the Most Probable Number method estimate in bacteriological water analysis?
Explanation:
The multiple-tube or Most Probable Number approach is based on inoculating measured sample volumes into suitable culture media. The pattern of positive and negative reactions across the tube series is interpreted statistically. The resulting MPN is therefore an estimate of bacterial density rather than a direct physical count of every organism. It has traditionally been used for coliform analysis and remains an important microbiological concept in water engineering. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 16
ప్రశ్న 16
Which statement correctly distinguishes the MPN and membrane-filtration approaches?
Explanation:
The MPN method estimates organism concentration from probability relationships associated with positive and negative tube reactions. Membrane filtration physically concentrates organisms from a measured sample onto a filter that is subsequently cultured. The two approaches therefore use different analytical principles even though both can be applied to indicator organisms. Selection depends on sample characteristics, required method and laboratory circumstances. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 17
ప్రశ్న 17
Why should a bacteriological water sample be collected aseptically in a sterile container?
Explanation:
Microbiological testing is highly sensitive to contamination introduced during sample collection. Contact with unclean hands, containers, taps or equipment can introduce organisms that were not actually present in the water being assessed. A sterile container and aseptic collection procedure therefore protect the validity of the analytical result. Sampling quality is as important as laboratory technique when interpreting bacteriological data. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 18
ప్రశ్న 18
Why is sodium thiosulphate commonly provided in bacteriological sample bottles used for chlorinated drinking water?
Explanation:
Residual disinfectant can continue acting on microorganisms after a water sample has left the distribution system. If this action is allowed to continue, the laboratory result may underestimate the bacterial condition at the instant of sampling. Sodium thiosulphate neutralizes residual chlorine in the sample bottle and effectively stops further chlorination. This improves the representativeness of the microbiological result obtained from chlorinated water. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 19
ప్రశ్న 19
Which practice is most appropriate after collecting a bacteriological drinking-water sample?
Explanation:
Microbial populations in a collected sample can change during prolonged storage. Some organisms may die while others may multiply depending on temperature, nutrients and residual disinfectant. Microbiological samples should therefore be transported and analysed promptly under the applicable preservation procedure. Delays or inappropriate storage can make the laboratory result unrepresentative of conditions at the sampling point. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 20
ప్రశ్న 20
How can excessive turbidity adversely affect microbiological safety even when a disinfectant is applied?
Explanation:
Suspended and colloidal particles can provide physical protection to microorganisms against disinfectants. Organic and inorganic matter associated with turbidity can also consume part of the applied disinfectant. Effective clarification and filtration are therefore important barriers before final disinfection in turbid surface-water treatment. Low turbidity improves the reliability of microbiological control rather than merely improving appearance. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 21
ప్రశ్న 21
Which statement about residual disinfectant and bacteriological quality is most appropriate?
Explanation:
A suitable disinfectant residual can help protect treated water against microbial intrusion and regrowth during distribution. However, a residual reading does not directly measure indicator organisms and cannot prove microbiological compliance by itself. Bacteriological monitoring remains necessary to verify sanitary performance. Residual disinfectant and microbiological testing are complementary elements of a multiple-barrier approach. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 22
ప్రశ్న 22
Why is E. coli detection in treated distribution water normally treated as more serious evidence of sanitary failure than detection of total coliforms alone?
Explanation:
E. coli normally originates from the intestinal environment of humans and other warm-blooded animals. Its presence therefore strongly indicates contamination by faecal material. Total coliforms are a broader group and can originate from non-faecal environmental sources as well as from contamination. Both results are important in treated water, but E. coli carries a more direct faecal-contamination implication. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 23
ప్రశ్న 23
A treated-water sample entering a distribution system shows E. coli not detected but total coliforms detected. What is the most appropriate interpretation?
Explanation:
For treated water entering the distribution system, total coliform bacteria are required not to be detectable in the specified sample. The absence of E. coli is favourable with respect to direct evidence of faecal contamination. Nevertheless, detection of total coliforms means the treated-water bacteriological requirement is not satisfied. Investigation should consider treatment performance, sample integrity and possible post-treatment contamination. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 24
ప్రశ్న 24
If repeated downstream samples in a distribution system show indicator bacteria while water leaving the treatment plant is consistently compliant, which engineering interpretation is most reasonable?
Explanation:
Compliant water leaving the treatment plant indicates that the treatment barrier was performing satisfactorily at that sampling location and time. Repeated indicator detections farther downstream point toward possible intrusion, storage contamination, loss of disinfectant protection, cross-connections, leakage-related ingress or biofilm effects. A systematic sanitary investigation and confirmatory sampling are therefore warranted. Distribution-system microbiological safety depends on maintaining water quality after treatment as well as producing safe water at the plant. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 25
ప్రశ్న 25
Which statement correctly distinguishes bacteriological compliance from overall drinking-water compliance?
Explanation:
Drinking-water safety is evaluated across several classes of parameters. Absence of E. coli and other required bacteriological indicators is essential but does not establish chemical compliance. Water can be microbiologically satisfactory while containing excessive nitrate, fluoride, arsenic or another chemical contaminant. Conversely, chemically acceptable water can still be unsafe because of microbial contamination. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 26
ప్రశ్న 26
Which response is most appropriate when E. coli is confirmed in a drinking-water distribution sample?
Explanation:
The current criterion is non-detection of E. coli in the specified drinking-water sample. A confirmed positive result therefore cannot be treated as acceptable merely because the number detected is small. Appropriate response includes verification of sampling and analytical validity together with investigation of treatment, storage, disinfection and distribution integrity. Corrective action should address the identified contamination route and be followed by suitable monitoring. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 27
ప్రశ్న 27
Consider the following statements about bacteriological drinking-water quality: I. E. coli is a specific indicator of faecal contamination. II. Total coliforms are a broader indicator group and can signal treatment or distribution-system integrity problems. III. Current drinking-water requirements use non-detection in a 100 mL sample for the relevant coliform criteria rather than accepting an obsolete routine count. IV. Absence of indicator bacteria in one sample cannot prove absolute absence of every possible waterborne pathogen from the entire system. Which option is correct?
Explanation:
Statement I is correct because E. coli is strongly associated with faecal pollution. Statement II is correct because total coliform detection can reveal operational or sanitary-integrity problems even when E. coli is absent. Statement III correctly reflects the current non-detection approach used for the applicable 100 mL drinking-water bacteriological samples. Statement IV is correct because indicator monitoring is a risk-management tool rather than proof that every possible pathogen is absent everywhere and at all times. Therefore all four statements are correct and Option D is the valid answer.
వివరణ:
Answer Key సమాధానాల పట్టిక
-
Question 1 ప్రశ్న 1Answer: B. Because suitable indicator organisms provide a practical means of detecting faecal contamination or treatment failure without individually testing for every pathogen సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 2 ప్రశ్న 2Answer: A. Escherichia coli సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 3 ప్రశ్న 3Answer: B. Total coliforms are a broader indicator group, while E. coli is more specifically associated with faecal contamination సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 4 ప్రశ్న 4Answer: A. Coliform organisms capable of being detected under elevated incubation-temperature conditions historically used to indicate faecal contamination సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 5 ప్రశ్న 5Answer: C. They shall not be detectable in any 100 mL sample సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 6 ప్రశ్న 6Answer: A. They shall not be detectable in a 100 mL sample సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 7 ప్రశ్న 7Answer: C. The bacteriological requirement is not satisfied and faecal contamination must be suspected సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 8 ప్రశ్న 8Answer: B. It satisfies the E. coli criterion for that sample but does not prove absolute absence of every possible pathogen సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 9 ప్రశ్న 9Answer: B. It can indicate a problem with treatment effectiveness, regrowth, intrusion or distribution-system integrity and warrants investigation సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 10 ప్రశ్న 10Answer: B. A measured water volume is passed through a membrane that retains bacteria, and the membrane is cultured on an appropriate medium సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 11 ప్రశ్న 11Answer: B. IS 15185:2016 సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 12 ప్రశ్న 12Answer: A. Because the method can process a defined relatively large sample volume and directly recover target colonies on the membrane సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 13 ప్రశ్న 13Answer: A. 3 CFU/100 mL and bacteriologically non-compliant సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 14 ప్రశ్న 14Answer: C. 4 CFU/100 mL సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 15 ప్రశ్న 15Answer: A. A statistically inferred concentration of indicator bacteria from the pattern of positive and negative culture tubes సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 16 ప్రశ్న 16Answer: A. MPN is based on statistical interpretation of positive culture tubes, whereas membrane filtration permits colonies retained from a known water volume to be detected or enumerated on a membrane సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 17 ప్రశ్న 17Answer: A. To prevent organisms introduced during sampling from producing a false indication of contamination సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 18 ప్రశ్న 18Answer: A. To neutralize residual chlorine so that it does not continue killing bacteria after the sample has been collected సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 19 ప్రశ్న 19Answer: A. Analyse it as promptly as practicable under prescribed sample-preservation and transport conditions సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 20 ప్రశ్న 20Answer: A. Particles can shield microorganisms and increase disinfectant demand, reducing effective disinfection సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 21 ప్రశ్న 21Answer: A. A disinfectant residual is an operational protective barrier, but its presence does not replace required bacteriological testing సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 22 ప్రశ్న 22Answer: A. Because E. coli has a stronger and more specific association with faecal contamination సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 23 ప్రశ్న 23Answer: B. The water fails the treated-water total-coliform requirement and the treatment or sanitary integrity should be investigated సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 24 ప్రశ్న 24Answer: A. Contamination or loss of sanitary integrity within storage or the distribution system should be investigated సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 25 ప్రశ్న 25Answer: B. Bacteriological compliance is one essential requirement, but applicable physical and chemical drinking-water requirements must also be satisfied సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 26 ప్రశ్న 26Answer: B. Treat it as evidence requiring prompt verification, sanitary investigation and corrective action because the non-detection requirement has failed సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 27 ప్రశ్న 27Answer: D. I, II, III and IV సమాధానం: D.
