Please keep at least one language enabled. || కనీసం ఒక భాషను ఎంచుకోండి.
Question 1
ప్రశ్న 1
An urban road-marking plan includes a centre line, a STOP line, chevrons near a channelizing island and arrows on turning lanes. Which classification is consistent with IRC:35-2015?
Explanation:
IRC:35 classifies pavement markings by their orientation and traffic-control function. Centre lines are longitudinal markings because they follow the direction of travel. A STOP line is a transverse marking placed across an approach. Chevron channelization falls under hazard marking, while directional arrows form a separate arrow-marking category. Correct classification helps engineers select the appropriate pattern and its application rather than treating all painted markings alike.
వివరణ:
Question 2
ప్రశ్న 2
On a two-way road and a nearby one-way multilane road, an engineer must distinguish a centre line from a traffic lane line. Which statement is correct?
Explanation:
A centre line identifies the separation between opposing streams on an undivided road. A traffic lane line divides lanes used by traffic moving in the same direction. One-way and divided carriageways consequently use lane lines within their directional carriageways. The line type may be broken or continuous according to the permitted manoeuvres and hazard conditions. Confusing the two functions can lead to inappropriate lane-change or overtaking guidance.
వివరణ:
Question 3
ప్రశ్న 3
A rural two-way road has an unimportant paved carriageway less than 5.5 m wide and no special hazard at the location. What is the most defensible treatment of its centre-line marking under IRC:35-2015?
Explanation:
IRC:35 cautions against indiscriminate centre-line marking on unimportant narrow carriageways. A continuous centre line can suggest that adequate width exists for opposing vehicles to pass comfortably. That suggestion may be misleading where the paved width is below 5.5 m. The code recognises specific short hazardous sections where marking can still be useful. Selection should reflect actual width, visibility, traffic conditions and the safety purpose of the marking.
వివరణ:
Question 4
ప్రశ్న 4
An engineer proposes separating a narrow carriageway into two marked same-direction lanes, but the available paved width cannot accommodate the required lane widths. Which design decision best follows IRC principles?
Explanation:
A traffic lane line should define usable lanes with appropriate widths. Drawing an extra line does not increase the physical width of the carriageway. If the available width is inadequate, two marked lanes may induce close side-by-side operation. This can increase the risk of sideswipe conflicts. The responsible approach is to omit or redesign the proposed division until the relevant lane-width requirement can be met.
వివరణ:
Question 5
ప్రశ్న 5
A driver approaches a broken longitudinal lane line and, farther ahead, a continuous longitudinal line beside a hazardous section. Which interpretation is most defensible?
Explanation:
Broken longitudinal markings ordinarily permit crossing when the manoeuvre is safe and otherwise allowed. A continuous longitudinal line indicates a restriction on crossing the marked boundary. This distinction is central to lane discipline and overtaking control. The existence of a broken line does not remove the need to check other traffic and signs. A driver must follow the entire road-control arrangement rather than interpret line style in isolation.
వివరణ:
Question 6
ప్రశ్న 6
An undivided two-way highway has a double solid centre marking through a restricted-sight-distance section. What should the marking communicate?
Explanation:
A double solid centre marking reinforces a restriction on crossing between opposing traffic streams. It is suitable where the selected alignment or visibility conditions justify a no-overtaking zone. The restriction applies to vehicles approaching from either direction. The marking helps reduce exposure to head-on and overtaking-related conflicts. Other advance warning and road delineation may complement it where the hazard warrants them.
వివరణ:
Question 7
ప్రశ్న 7
On an undivided two-way road, a centre marking consists of one continuous line beside one broken line. Which interpretation is appropriate, provided no other restriction applies?
Explanation:
A paired continuous and broken centre marking can impose an asymmetric restriction. The driver whose side has the continuous line is not permitted to cross that line in normal use. A driver alongside the broken line may cross only when conditions and the remaining road controls permit. Such treatment can support directional differences in available sight distance. Engineers must make the transition lengths and approach warning clear to both streams.
వివరణ:
Question 8
ప్రశ్న 8
A survey identifies inadequate overtaking visibility near a summit curve on an undivided highway. Which road-marking strategy is most consistent with IRC:35-2015?
Explanation:
No-overtaking markings are appropriate where available sight distance makes the manoeuvre hazardous. IRC:35 addresses these situations at summit curves and horizontal curves. Its procedure considers the operating-speed-related visibility distances when defining the restricted stretch. Advance warning-line treatment helps alert approaching drivers to the change in overtaking permission. The result should be based on measured geometry and visibility rather than an arbitrary painted length.
వివరణ:
Question 9
ప్రశ్న 9
Along a road section with paved shoulders having nearly the same appearance as the carriageway, drivers lose track of the running-roadway limit at night. Which marking treatment most directly addresses this problem?
Explanation:
An edge line identifies the outer limit of the running carriageway. This is particularly useful when the paved shoulder has a similar texture or colour to the traffic lanes. Continuous edge guidance can also improve alignment recognition during darkness or poor weather. The marking must be positioned so that mud and water do not unnecessarily conceal it. It does not by itself turn the shoulder into an additional traffic lane.
వివరణ:
Question 10
ప్రశ్న 10
An approach to a signalized intersection has a marked pedestrian crossing and a controlled stopping position. Which marking correctly identifies the position beyond which approaching vehicles must not advance while required to stop?
Explanation:
A STOP line is a transverse road marking associated with an applicable traffic control. It identifies where the controlled approach is required to stop. At signalized locations, its position must be coordinated with signals and pedestrian crossings. Longitudinal lane separators do not define the stopping position. The marking should be clearly visible and should avoid encroachment into the intended pedestrian area.
వివరణ:
Question 11
ప్రశ్న 11
A priority-controlled minor road meets a major road. The engineer is selecting markings for compulsory STOP control versus GIVE WAY control. Which combination follows the distinguishing arrangements in IRC:35-2015?
Explanation:
STOP and GIVE WAY communicate different obligations at a minor-road approach. IRC:35 distinguishes the applicable transverse marking patterns for these controls. STOP-specific markings and the accompanying sign are used where a compulsory stop is imposed. GIVE WAY markings use a broken transverse pattern and the corresponding regulatory sign. Mixing conflicting controls at the same approach can make the right-of-way rule unclear.
వివరణ:
Question 12
ప్రశ్న 12
At an unsignalized pedestrian zebra crossing governed by the cited IRC:35-2015 layout provision, what is the usual setback of the STOP line from the start of the zebra marking?
Explanation:
The road-marking code provides for a stopping position ahead of an unsignalized zebra crossing. The stated IRC:35 provision locates the STOP line about 2 m to 3 m before the crossing. This setback helps keep stopped vehicles from occupying the pedestrian path. Its actual placement must fit the control scheme and approach visibility. A zebra crossing and its STOP line perform distinct but complementary functions.
వివరణ:
Question 13
ప్రశ్న 13
At a pedestrian crossing, the uninterrupted roadway width a pedestrian must traverse is 12 m. Under the specific IRC:35-2015 recommendation for crossings longer than 10.5 m in one stage, which provision is appropriate?
Explanation:
IRC:35 identifies a pedestrian-refuge provision when a crossing would exceed 10.5 m in one stage. A 12 m uninterrupted crossing exceeds that threshold. The cited guidance calls for an intermediate refuge island at least 1.2 m wide. A refuge enables pedestrians to cross different traffic streams in stages. Adequate accessibility, sight distance, waiting space and suitable traffic control still need to be checked.
వివరణ:
Question 14
ప్రశ్న 14
At a signalized intersection, the extreme right lane is dedicated exclusively to right turns under left-hand traffic, while the adjacent lane serves ahead movements. What pavement-arrow strategy is most appropriate?
Explanation:
Directional arrows help drivers choose the appropriate approach lane before reaching a junction. An exclusive right-turn lane should be marked consistently with its permitted movement. Through lanes should display arrows compatible with their authorised destinations. Incorrect arrows can encourage late lane changes and conflict with signal indications. The layout must also reflect turning demand, lane width and the regulatory control scheme.
వివరణ:
Question 15
ప్రశ్న 15
At the start of an exit deceleration lane on a divided highway, vehicles need early guidance distinguishing the exit from the through path. Which pavement marking most directly fulfils this function?
Explanation:
A bifurcation arrow illustrates the divergence between an ahead movement and an exiting movement. IRC:35 provides for its use near the commencement of deceleration lanes. It helps drivers identify the correct path with sufficient time to manoeuvre. The marking should coordinate with lane development and advance direction signing. It is not a substitute for checking taper, speed-change and diverge geometry.
వివరణ:
Question 16
ప్రశ్న 16
At a freeway diverge, a triangular paved neutral area lies between the through carriageway and the exiting ramp. Which marking and operating interpretation is most appropriate?
Explanation:
Diverging vehicle streams need clear path definition near a gore or channelizing nose. Chevron and diagonal hazard markings delineate pavement not intended for normal through movement. They guide drivers into the appropriate route and reduce ambiguity around the nose. The layout should coordinate with signs and continuous lane or edge markings. A painted neutral area must not be assumed to provide the same impact protection as a physical barrier.
వివరణ:
Question 17
ప్రశ్న 17
An underpass pier constitutes a fixed obstruction within the carriageway envelope, where an errant vehicle could strike its exposed face. Which object-marking treatment is specified by IRC:35-2015 for this type of obstruction?
Explanation:
IRC:35-2015 distinguishes objects within the carriageway from those adjacent to it. Section 14.2.1 specifies alternating black-and-yellow markings for obstructions within the carriageway, including underpass piers. The markings consist of at least six diagonal stripes sloping downward towards approaching traffic at 45 degrees. Each stripe must be at least 300 mm wide under the specified provision. Appropriate advance warning and pavement hazard markings can supplement this treatment. The markings improve conspicuity but do not eliminate the need to assess vehicle clearance and physical protection.
వివరణ:
Question 18
ప్రశ్న 18
Raised retroreflective pavement markers are being considered to supplement edge and lane markings on a road subject to poor nighttime visibility. Which engineering statement is most accurate?
Explanation:
Road studs can supplement painted longitudinal and transverse markings. Their reflectors return light from vehicle headlights towards approaching drivers. They are useful where alignment guidance is difficult during darkness or adverse weather. Performance depends on their placement, reflector condition and durability under traffic. They complement, rather than replace, basic pavement marking and geometric safety design.
వివరణ:
Question 19
ప్రశ్న 19
On a multilane divided carriageway in India's left-hand traffic system, a maintenance crew must restore road studs beside the shoulder-side left edge and median-side right edge. Which arrangement follows IRC:35-2015 guidance for the relevant reflective stud faces?
Explanation:
The reflector colours of road studs can communicate the type and location of a longitudinal boundary. Under IRC:35, red studs delineate the shoulder-side left edge of the running carriageway. Yellow studs delineate the right edge adjacent to the median of a multilane divided road. Other colours are applicable to lane divisions and selected crossable openings. The road authority should install the studs in a consistent arrangement appropriate to the actual carriageway configuration.
వివరణ:
Question 20
ప్రశ్న 20
A busy market street has marked kerbside parking, a bus stop and access to an emergency facility. What is the most defensible parking-marking plan?
Explanation:
Parking markings help allocate limited kerbside space without obstructing important roadside functions. Bus stops and emergency access points should not be inadvertently included as ordinary parking bays. Appropriate restrictions and signs communicate where parking or waiting is prohibited. Marked bay boundaries can improve orderly use of the available space. The final scheme should also preserve the required running-lane width and pedestrian accessibility.
వివరణ:
Question 21
ప్రశ్న 21
A road-marking audit shows that lane lines are visible in daylight but almost disappear in vehicle headlights on dry nights. Which material-performance measure most directly addresses this shortcoming?
Explanation:
Daytime visibility and nighttime retroreflectivity are distinct pavement-marking performance characteristics. Glass beads in suitable marking systems return headlamp light towards the driver. Loss of embedded beads or worn marking material can impair nighttime detection. The corrective work should include material selection, application control and subsequent performance measurement. Improvements must also preserve acceptable friction and durability rather than aiming only for brightness.
వివరణ:
Question 22
ప్రశ్న 22
A contractor proposes yellow longitudinal road markings on a National Highway concrete pavement solely because the original IRC:35-2015 text distinguished concrete from bituminous pavement. What should an engineer apply for National Highway works in light of MoRTH's 2019 clarification?
Explanation:
IRC:35-2015 included a general colour distinction for markings on concrete surfaces. The Ministry subsequently issued a clarification concerning National Highway works. That direction specifies the use of white marking on concrete surfaces instead of the earlier general yellow provision where relevant. Engineers must therefore read the code together with applicable later government instructions. Special markings and restrictions still require the correct pattern and colour under the governing provisions.
వివరణ:
Question 23
ప్రశ్న 23
For a simplified preview-distance check, pavement markings should first be detectable at least 2 seconds before a vehicle reaches the relevant decision location. At a constant approach speed of 72 km/h, what is this distance?
Explanation:
The required travel distance is the product of speed and preview time. A speed of 72 km/h equals 72 divided by 3.6, or 20 m/s. The assumed preview time is 2 seconds. Therefore the corresponding distance is 20 times 2 = 40 m. This elementary preview check does not replace sight-distance or reaction-and-manoeuvre requirements for a specific hazard.
వివరణ:
Question 24
ప్రశ్న 24
Over a 900 m lane line, an illustrative repeated pattern has a 3 m painted segment followed by a 6 m unpainted gap. If the first segment starts at the beginning and the pattern repeats exactly to the end, and the painted line is 0.15 m wide, what area of paint is required, neglecting losses?
Explanation:
One full marking cycle consists of 3 m of paint and 6 m of gap, giving a 9 m cycle. A 900 m length contains exactly 900/9 = 100 such cycles. The painted longitudinal length is consequently 100 times 3 = 300 m. At a width of 0.15 m, the painted surface area is 300 times 0.15 = 45 square metres. The exercise assumes complete repeated cycles and excludes waste or overlaps.
వివరణ:
Question 25
ప్రశ్న 25
A safety audit finds worn centre lines, obscured object markings, faded zebra stripes and conflicting lane arrows after a junction has been widened. Which engineering response is most defensible?
Explanation:
Pavement markings must match the actual road geometry and authorised vehicle movements. Conflicting arrows and worn lane lines can contribute to late manoeuvres and sideswipe risk. Faded pedestrian crossings and object markings can also undermine hazard recognition. An engineering audit should check layout, daytime and nighttime performance, maintenance and interaction with traffic-control devices. The corrective programme should restore a consistent, comprehensible system rather than merely repaint isolated elements.
వివరణ:
Answer Key సమాధానాల పట్టిక
-
Question 1 ప్రశ్న 1Answer: C. The centre line is longitudinal, the STOP line transverse, chevrons are hazard markings and arrows are arrow markings. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 2 ప్రశ్న 2Answer: B. A centre line can separate opposing streams on an undivided two-way road, while a lane line can separate lanes travelling in the same direction. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 3 ప్రశ్న 3Answer: C. Ordinarily avoid a centre line because it may misleadingly suggest adequate width for two opposing lanes; assess exceptional hazard locations separately. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 4 ప్రశ్న 4Answer: A. Do not introduce the additional lane line unless adequate lane width can be provided between the relevant markings. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 5 ప్రశ్న 5Answer: C. The broken line may be crossed when otherwise safe and permitted; the continuous line indicates that the marked boundary is not to be crossed in normal operation. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 6 ప్రశ్న 6Answer: D. Neither direction should cross the double continuous centre marking for overtaking. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 7 ప్రశ్న 7Answer: B. Crossing is restricted for vehicles on the continuous-line side, while those on the broken-line side may cross when otherwise safe and permitted. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 8 ప్రశ్న 8Answer: A. Establish an appropriate no-overtaking barrier marking through the restricted-visibility section, with advance warning-line treatment determined from the applicable visibility assessment. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 9 ప్రశ్న 9Answer: D. A properly located continuous edge line delineating the running carriageway boundary. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 10 ప్రశ్న 10Answer: C. A transverse STOP line placed in accordance with the signal and pedestrian-crossing layout. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 11 ప్రశ్న 11Answer: B. Use STOP-specific transverse markings with a STOP sign where stopping is compulsory, and the specified broken GIVE WAY lines with a GIVE WAY sign where yielding is required. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 12 ప్రశ్న 12Answer: A. 2 m to 3 m in advance of the crossing. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 13 ప్రశ్న 13Answer: C. Provide an intermediate pedestrian refuge island of at least the specified 1.2 m width, with accessible crossing design. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 14 ప్రశ్న 14Answer: D. Use lane-specific right-turn and ahead arrows matching the permitted movements, supported by appropriate signs or signals. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 15 ప్రశ్న 15Answer: A. An appropriately positioned bifurcation arrow directing vehicles into the correct through or exit path. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 16 ప్రశ్న 16Answer: C. Use appropriate diagonal or chevron hazard markings to define the neutral area and guide traffic to the correct side. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 17 ప్రశ్న 17Answer: B. Use at least six alternating black-and-yellow diagonal stripes sloping downward towards approaching traffic at 45 degrees, with each stripe at least 300 mm wide, supplemented by appropriate advance hazard markings. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 18 ప్రశ్న 18Answer: D. Properly placed retroreflective markers can reinforce the marked vehicle paths at night but require appropriate spacing, durability and maintenance checks. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 19 ప్రశ్న 19Answer: A. Use red studs at the left running-carriageway edge and yellow studs at the median-side edge, with permitted exceptions at crossing or exit openings. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 20 ప్రశ్న 20Answer: B. Delineate authorised parking spaces and keep the bus stop and emergency access clear using appropriate restriction markings and signs. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 21 ప్రశ్న 21Answer: C. Restore adequate nighttime retroreflectivity, for example through suitable marking material and correctly embedded glass beads, with field verification. సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 22 ప్రశ్న 22Answer: B. Apply the MoRTH direction to use white markings on concrete National Highway pavements as prescribed for the corresponding marking types, rather than relying on the superseded general concrete-colour provision. సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 23 ప్రశ్న 23Answer: D. 40 m. సమాధానం: D.
-
Question 24 ప్రశ్న 24Answer: A. 45 square metres. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 25 ప్రశ్న 25Answer: D. Survey the revised movements and hazards, correct the marking layout, restore visibility and coordinate it with signs, signals and pedestrian facilities. సమాధానం: D.
