Please keep at least one language enabled. || కనీసం ఒక భాషను ఎంచుకోండి.
Question 1
ప్రశ్న 1
Which statement correctly reflects the IS 456 treatment of torsion in reinforced-concrete structures?
Explanation:
IS 456 distinguishes torsion required for structural equilibrium from torsion arising through redundant restraint in indeterminate systems. Equilibrium torsion must be adequately resisted because it cannot simply disappear without disturbing equilibrium. In an appropriate indeterminate system, redundant torsion may be released when the structural analysis neglects the corresponding torsional stiffness. The member must nevertheless have adequate reinforcement to control cracking as required by the applicable provisions. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 2
ప్రశ్న 2
Which description best represents the structural behaviour and reinforcement concept of an RCC beam subjected to significant torsion?
Explanation:
Torsion generates shear stresses around the cross-section and can lead to inclined cracking on several faces of the member. A spatial resistance mechanism is therefore required after cracking. Closed transverse reinforcement helps resist the torsional shear component. Longitudinal reinforcement distributed around the section provides the complementary longitudinal resistance. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 3
ప్రశ్న 3
How does the IS 456 Limit State approach account for combined bending, shear and torsion in an RCC beam?
Explanation:
IS 456 does not treat required torsional reinforcement as an isolated reinforcement system unrelated to bending and shear. The torsional effect is combined with the actual bending moment to obtain equivalent bending actions for longitudinal reinforcement. Shear and torsion are similarly combined through an equivalent shear concept for the relevant checks. Transverse reinforcement is then determined from the applicable combined shear-and-torsion provisions. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 4
ప్రశ్న 4
For torsion design near the support of an RCC beam, what provision applies to sections located at a distance less than d from the face of the support?
Explanation:
IS 456 identifies a practical critical-section provision for torsion near supports. Sections located within one effective depth d from the support face need not each be designed for separately increasing torsional values. They may be designed for the torsion computed at a section located d from the face of the support. This provision is analogous in spirit to recognizing localized support-region behaviour. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 5
ప్రశ్న 5
For a rectangular RCC beam subjected to factored shear Vu and factored torsional moment Tu, which expression gives the IS 456 equivalent shear Ve?
Explanation:
IS 456 combines the effects of actual shear and torsion through an equivalent shear expression. The specified relation is Ve = Vu + 1.6Tu/b. The torsional moment must be expressed in units consistent with the beam breadth so that Tu/b has units of force. This equivalent shear is subsequently used to obtain the equivalent nominal shear stress. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 6
ప్రశ్న 6
A rectangular beam has b = 300 mm, d = 550 mm and D = 600 mm and is subjected to Vu = 120 kN, Tu = 30 kN·m and Mu = 150 kN·m. What is the equivalent shear Ve?
Explanation:
The equivalent shear is Ve = Vu + 1.6Tu/b. The torsional contribution is 1.6 × 30 × 10^6/300 = 160000 N, or 160 kN. Adding the actual shear of 120 kN gives Ve = 280 kN. The bending moment does not enter the equivalent shear expression but is required separately for the longitudinal torsion design. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 7
ప్రశ్న 7
For the beam in the previous question, take M25 concrete and assume the relevant Table 19 value is τc = 0.64 N/mm². Which statement correctly describes the equivalent shear check?
Explanation:
The equivalent nominal shear stress is τve = Ve/(bd). Substitution gives 280000/(300 × 550) = approximately 1.697 N/mm². This exceeds the stated concrete shear strength τc = 0.64 N/mm². It remains below the M25 maximum shear stress of 3.10 N/mm², so the section is not rejected on the maximum-stress criterion and reinforcement for the combined actions is required. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 8
ప్రశ్న 8
An M25 beam has b = 300 mm, d = 500 mm, Vu = 30 kN and Tu = 5 kN·m. If the applicable concrete design shear strength is τc = 0.64 N/mm², what follows from the equivalent shear check under the current amended IS 456 provisions?
Explanation:
The equivalent shear is Ve = 30 + 1.6(5 × 1000/300), which is approximately 56.67 kN. Hence τve = 56667/(300 × 500) = approximately 0.378 N/mm². This is below the stated concrete design shear strength τc = 0.64 N/mm². Under the amended Clause 41.3.2, minimum shear reinforcement is required and longitudinal reinforcement is also to be provided in accordance with Clause 41.4.2. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 9
ప్రశ్న 9
An M25 beam has b = 300 mm, d = 500 mm, Vu = 200 kN and Tu = 55 kN·m. What is the correct conclusion from the equivalent shear check?
Explanation:
The torsional contribution to equivalent shear is 1.6 × 55 × 1000/300 = approximately 293.33 kN. Adding the actual shear gives Ve approximately equal to 493.33 kN. The resulting equivalent nominal shear stress is 493333/(300 × 500) = approximately 3.29 N/mm². This exceeds the M25 value τc,max = 3.10 N/mm² and cannot be made acceptable merely by increasing transverse reinforcement. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 10
ప్రశ్న 10
A T-beam has effective flange width bf = 1000 mm, web width bw = 250 mm, d = 550 mm, Vu = 120 kN and Tu = 25 kN·m. Using the IS 456 torsion procedure for a flanged beam, which pair is correct?
Explanation:
For the code torsion procedure applied to a flanged beam, the web breadth bw is substituted for b. Thus Ve = 120 + 1.6(25 × 1000/250) = 280 kN. The equivalent nominal shear stress is 280000/(250 × 550) = approximately 2.04 N/mm². Using the full effective flange width in the denominator would incorrectly reduce the calculated torsional shear effect. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 11
ప్రశ్న 11
Which expression gives the torsional equivalent moment Mt used in designing longitudinal reinforcement under IS 456?
Explanation:
The torsional effect on longitudinal reinforcement is represented by an equivalent torsional moment Mt. IS 456 defines it as Tu(1 + D/b)/1.7. The overall depth D and breadth b are therefore both involved in converting the torsion into the equivalent flexural action. This value is combined with the actual bending moment to obtain the principal equivalent bending moment. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 12
ప్రశ్న 12
For the rectangular beam with b = 300 mm, D = 600 mm and Tu = 30 kN·m, what is Mt approximately?
Explanation:
The torsional equivalent moment is Mt = Tu(1 + D/b)/1.7. Here D/b = 600/300 = 2.0. Thus Mt = 30(1 + 2)/1.7 = 90/1.7. The result is approximately 52.94 kN·m. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 13
ప్రశ్న 13
The same beam is subjected to Mu = 150 kN·m in addition to Tu = 30 kN·m. What equivalent bending moment Me1 should be used for the principal longitudinal reinforcement design?
Explanation:
The principal equivalent bending moment is Me1 = Mu + Mt. The actual bending moment is 150 kN·m and the calculated torsional equivalent moment is approximately 52.94 kN·m. Their sum is approximately 202.94 kN·m. This demonstrates that designing the longitudinal steel for Mu alone would neglect the required torsional contribution. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 14
ప్రశ్న 14
A beam has b = 300 mm, D = 600 mm, Mu = 40 kN·m and Tu = 30 kN·m. Since Mt is about 52.94 kN·m, what additional longitudinal design requirement arises?
Explanation:
IS 456 requires an additional equivalent bending check when Mt is numerically greater than Mu. In this case Mt is approximately 52.94 kN·m, which exceeds Mu = 40 kN·m. The secondary equivalent moment is Me2 = Mt - Mu = approximately 12.94 kN·m. Reinforcement is therefore required on the flexural compression face so that the section can resist this moment in the opposite sense. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 15
ప్రశ్న 15
An M25 Fe415 rectangular beam has b = 300 mm, d = 500 mm, D = 600 mm, Mu = 250 kN·m and Tu = 40 kN·m. Mt is about 70.59 kN·m, giving Me1 ≈ 320.59 kN·m, while the singly reinforced limiting moment is about 258.7 kN·m. What is the correct design interpretation?
Explanation:
Longitudinal reinforcement for combined bending and torsion is designed for the equivalent moment rather than for Mu alone. Here Me1 is approximately 320.59 kN·m. The corresponding singly reinforced limiting resistance is only about 258.7 kN·m for the stated section and materials. Simply increasing tensile reinforcement beyond the limiting condition would not provide an acceptable singly reinforced Limit State solution. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 16
ప్రశ్న 16
For the M25 Fe415 beam with b = 300 mm, d = 550 mm and Me1 = 202.94 kN·m, what tensile-steel area is required approximately if the equivalent flexural design is singly reinforced and the steel develops 0.87fy?
Explanation:
For the equivalent flexural design, xu = 0.87fyAst/(0.36fckb). Substitution of this relation into Me1 = 0.87fyAst(d - 0.42xu) gives the required steel area. Solving for the smaller physical root gives Ast approximately 1159 mm². The corresponding neutral-axis depth is about 155 mm, which is well below the Fe415 limiting neutral-axis depth for d = 550 mm. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 17
ప్రశ్న 17
When torsion reinforcement is required in an RCC beam, which reinforcement arrangement is consistent with IS 456?
Explanation:
Torsion causes stresses that require reinforcement acting in more than one direction. IS 456 therefore requires longitudinal as well as transverse reinforcement when torsion reinforcement is necessary. The transverse reinforcement is provided as closed hoops enclosing the corner longitudinal bars. Open stirrups do not provide the same closed torsional load path around the section. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 18
ప్రశ్న 18
For combined factored torsion Tu and shear Vu, which expression gives the required area Asv of a two-legged closed hoop at spacing sv under the IS 456 torsion provision?
Explanation:
The transverse reinforcement expression includes separate contributions from torsion and direct shear. The torsional term contains Tu divided by the product b1d1 and the design steel stress. The direct-shear term contains Vu divided by 2.5d1 and the same design steel stress. Both terms are multiplied by the stirrup spacing sv to obtain the required hoop area. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 19
ప్రశ్న 19
A beam has Tu = 30 kN·m, Vu = 120 kN, b1 = 240 mm, d1 = 500 mm and Fe415 closed hoops at spacing sv = 150 mm. Using the IS 456 combined torsion-and-shear expression, what Asv is required approximately?
Explanation:
The torsion contribution is Tu sv/[b1d1(0.87fy)], which evaluates to approximately 103.86 mm². The direct-shear contribution is Vu sv/[2.5d1(0.87fy)], which is approximately 39.88 mm². Adding the two contributions gives Asv approximately 143.75 mm². This value must also be checked against the separate lower-bound transverse-reinforcement requirement associated with τve - τc. Therefore Option C is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 20
ప్రశ్న 20
For the beam in the previous question, b = 300 mm, d = 550 mm, Ve = 280 kN and τc = 0.64 N/mm². At sv = 150 mm, the lower-bound transverse-reinforcement requirement based on (τve - τc)bsv/(0.87fy) is approximately 131.7 mm². Which requirement governs?
Explanation:
The equivalent nominal shear stress for the beam is approximately 1.697 N/mm². The stated lower-bound equation gives a required area of approximately 131.7 mm² at 150 mm spacing. The direct combined torsion-and-shear hoop equation gives the larger requirement of approximately 143.7 mm². The transverse reinforcement must satisfy both requirements, so the larger area controls. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 21
ప్రశ్న 21
For the same beam, two-legged 10 mm diameter Fe415 closed hoops provide Asv ≈ 157.1 mm². The combined torsion-and-shear strength equation permits a maximum spacing of about 163.9 mm, the lower-bound equation permits about 178.9 mm, and the torsion detailing limit is 185 mm. What spacing controls?
Explanation:
A proposed stirrup spacing has to satisfy every applicable strength and detailing restriction. The combined torsion-and-shear strength equation gives the smallest permissible maximum spacing in this case, approximately 163.9 mm. The lower-bound transverse requirement would allow a larger spacing of about 178.9 mm. The torsion detailing limit of 185 mm is also less restrictive than the strength requirement. Therefore a spacing not exceeding approximately 164 mm controls, making Option A correct.
వివరణ:
Question 22
ప్రశ్న 22
For torsion reinforcement, what is the IS 456 spacing limitation for rectangular closed stirrups in terms of their short and long dimensions x1 and y1?
Explanation:
IS 456 contains a specific detailing rule for transverse torsion reinforcement. The transverse reinforcement is formed by rectangular closed stirrups placed perpendicular to the member axis. Their spacing must not exceed x1, must not exceed (x1 + y1)/4, and must not exceed 300 mm. The smallest of these three limits governs the torsion detailing check. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 23
ప్రశ్న 23
A rectangular closed torsion stirrup has x1 = 240 mm and y1 = 500 mm. Ignoring any smaller spacing required by strength, what is the maximum spacing permitted by the torsion distribution rule?
Explanation:
The three torsion-detailing limits are x1, (x1 + y1)/4 and 300 mm. They are 240 mm, (240 + 500)/4 = 185 mm, and 300 mm respectively. The smallest value is therefore 185 mm. A strength calculation may still require a spacing smaller than this detailing maximum. Therefore Option B is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 24
ప్రశ్న 24
Which statement correctly describes the distribution of longitudinal reinforcement in a member designed for torsion?
Explanation:
Torsional resistance after cracking requires a reinforcement arrangement distributed around the member rather than concentrated at its centre. IS 456 therefore requires the longitudinal reinforcement to be placed as close as practicable to the section corners. At least one longitudinal bar must be present at each corner of the closed ties. Where a cross-sectional dimension exceeds 450 mm, additional longitudinal reinforcement is required to satisfy the relevant minimum reinforcement and spacing provisions. Therefore Option A is correct.
వివరణ:
Question 25
ప్రశ్న 25
Consider the following statements about the IS 456 Limit State design of members subjected to combined bending, shear and torsion:
1. Equivalent shear is Ve = Vu + 1.6Tu/b.
2. Longitudinal reinforcement is designed for Me1 = Mu + Mt, where Mt = Tu(1 + D/b)/1.7.
3. If Mt exceeds Mu, an additional opposite-sense moment Me2 = Mt - Mu has to be considered for reinforcement on the other face.
4. Rectangular torsion stirrups may be open at one side provided τve is less than τc,max.
Which statements are correct?
1. Equivalent shear is Ve = Vu + 1.6Tu/b.
2. Longitudinal reinforcement is designed for Me1 = Mu + Mt, where Mt = Tu(1 + D/b)/1.7.
3. If Mt exceeds Mu, an additional opposite-sense moment Me2 = Mt - Mu has to be considered for reinforcement on the other face.
4. Rectangular torsion stirrups may be open at one side provided τve is less than τc,max.
Which statements are correct?
Explanation:
Statement 1 correctly gives the IS 456 equivalent shear expression for combined shear and torsion. Statement 2 correctly gives the equivalent bending action used for the principal longitudinal reinforcement. Statement 3 correctly describes the additional opposite-face flexural requirement when Mt exceeds Mu. Statement 4 is incorrect because torsional transverse reinforcement is required to be in the form of rectangular closed stirrups under the stated detailing provision. Therefore Statements 1, 2 and 3 are correct and Option B is the unique answer.
వివరణ:
Answer Key సమాధానాల పట్టిక
-
Question 1 ప్రశ్న 1Answer: A. Where torsion is required to maintain equilibrium, the member shall be designed for torsion; in an indeterminate structure, torsion caused by redundant restraint may in appropriate cases be released if torsional stiffness is neglected in determining internal forces. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 2 ప్రశ్న 2Answer: A. Torsion can produce inclined cracking around the member, and effective resistance requires a combination of closed transverse reinforcement and appropriately distributed longitudinal reinforcement. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 3 ప్రశ్న 3Answer: A. Longitudinal reinforcement is designed using equivalent bending actions, while transverse reinforcement is designed using the combined effects of shear and torsion. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 4 ప్రశ్న 4Answer: A. They may be designed for the same torsional moment as that calculated at a distance d from the face of the support. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 5 ప్రశ్న 5Answer: A. Ve = Vu + 1.6Tu/b సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 6 ప్రశ్న 6Answer: C. 280 kN సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 7 ప్రశ్న 7Answer: A. τve is about 1.70 N/mm², which exceeds τc but is below τc,max = 3.10 N/mm², so the required longitudinal and transverse reinforcement provisions for combined actions apply. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 8 ప్రశ్న 8Answer: A. τve is about 0.378 N/mm²; minimum shear reinforcement is required and longitudinal reinforcement shall also be provided as required by the torsion provisions. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 9 ప్రశ్న 9Answer: A. Ve is about 493.3 kN and τve is about 3.29 N/mm², which exceeds τc,max = 3.10 N/mm², so the section should be redesigned. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 10 ప్రశ్న 10Answer: A. Ve = 280 kN and τve ≈ 2.04 N/mm² using bw = 250 mm సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 11 ప్రశ్న 11Answer: A. Mt = Tu(1 + D/b)/1.7 సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 12 ప్రశ్న 12Answer: C. 52.9 kN·m సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 13 ప్రశ్న 13Answer: C. 202.9 kN·m సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 14 ప్రశ్న 14Answer: A. Because Mt exceeds Mu, longitudinal reinforcement is also required on the flexural compression face for Me2 = Mt - Mu ≈ 12.94 kN·m acting in the opposite sense. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 15 ప్రశ్న 15Answer: A. The equivalent bending demand exceeds the singly reinforced limiting capacity, so the section dimensions should be increased or an appropriate doubly reinforced design should be adopted. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 16 ప్రశ్న 16Answer: C. 1159 mm² సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 17 ప్రశ్న 17Answer: A. Longitudinal reinforcement together with two-legged closed hoops enclosing the corner longitudinal bars సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 18 ప్రశ్న 18Answer: A. Asv = Tu sv/[b1d1(0.87fy)] + Vu sv/[2.5d1(0.87fy)] సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 19 ప్రశ్న 19Answer: C. 143.7 mm² సమాధానం: C.
-
Question 20 ప్రశ్న 20Answer: A. The combined torsion-and-shear expression governs with Asv ≈ 143.7 mm². సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 21 ప్రశ్న 21Answer: A. Approximately 164 mm సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 22 ప్రశ్న 22Answer: A. The spacing shall not exceed the least of x1, (x1 + y1)/4 and 300 mm. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 23 ప్రశ్న 23Answer: B. 185 mm సమాధానం: B.
-
Question 24 ప్రశ్న 24Answer: A. Longitudinal reinforcement should be placed as close as practicable to the corners, with at least one longitudinal bar at each corner of the ties; when a cross-sectional dimension exceeds 450 mm, additional longitudinal bars are required to satisfy the applicable minimum reinforcement and spacing provisions. సమాధానం: A.
-
Question 25 ప్రశ్న 25Answer: B. 1, 2 and 3 only సమాధానం: B.
