అంతర్జాతీయ సంఘటనలు మరియు సంబంధాలు - టెస్ట్ 89 - దక్షిణ చైనా సముద్రం మరియు ఆగ్నేయాసియా సముద్ర వివాదాలు
Please keep at least one language enabled. || కనీసం ఒక భాషను ఎంచుకోండి.
Question 1
ప్రశ్న 1
Which set includes the principal claimants to at least some islands, reefs or maritime areas in the South China Sea?
South China Seaలో కనీసం కొన్ని islands, reefs లేదా maritime areasపై claims ఉన్న principal claimantsను చూపే set ఏది?
Explanation:
• The South China Sea disputes involve overlapping claims of different kinds and geographical extent.
• Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam assert claims concerning particular islands, reefs or maritime areas.
• Their claims are not identical, so they should not be described as asserting exactly the same territory or legal basis.
• Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam assert claims concerning particular islands, reefs or maritime areas.
• Their claims are not identical, so they should not be described as asserting exactly the same territory or legal basis.
వివరణ:
• South China Sea disputesలో different kinds మరియు geographical extent కలిగిన overlapping claims ఉన్నాయి.
• Brunei, China, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan మరియు Vietnam particular islands, reefs లేదా maritime areasకు సంబంధించిన claims assert చేస్తున్నాయి.
• అన్ని claims identical కావు; ఒకే territory లేదా ఒకే legal basisను claim చేస్తున్నట్లు చెప్పకూడదు.
• Brunei, China, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan మరియు Vietnam particular islands, reefs లేదా maritime areasకు సంబంధించిన claims assert చేస్తున్నాయి.
• అన్ని claims identical కావు; ఒకే territory లేదా ఒకే legal basisను claim చేస్తున్నట్లు చెప్పకూడదు.
Question 2
ప్రశ్న 2
Which statement most accurately describes Indonesia's position in relation to the South China Sea disputes?
South China Sea disputesకు సంబంధించి Indonesia positionను అత్యంత ఖచ్చితంగా వివరించే ప్రకటన ఏది?
Explanation:
• Indonesia is generally distinguished from the territorial claimants to the Spratly and Paracel island groups.
• The Natuna Islands themselves are Indonesian territory and are not the subject of a competing sovereignty claim in the principal South China Sea island disputes.
• Disagreement instead concerns overlapping assertions of maritime rights in waters north of the Natunas.
• The Natuna Islands themselves are Indonesian territory and are not the subject of a competing sovereignty claim in the principal South China Sea island disputes.
• Disagreement instead concerns overlapping assertions of maritime rights in waters north of the Natunas.
వివరణ:
• Indonesiaను Spratly మరియు Paracel island groups territorial claimants నుంచి సాధారణంగా distinguish చేస్తారు.
• Natuna Islands స్వయంగా Indonesian territory; principal South China Sea island disputesలో వాటి sovereignty ప్రధాన వివాద అంశం కాదు.
• Disagreement ప్రధానంగా Natunasకు northలోని watersపై maritime-right assertionsకు సంబంధించినది.
• Natuna Islands స్వయంగా Indonesian territory; principal South China Sea island disputesలో వాటి sovereignty ప్రధాన వివాద అంశం కాదు.
• Disagreement ప్రధానంగా Natunasకు northలోని watersపై maritime-right assertionsకు సంబంధించినది.
Question 3
ప్రశ్న 3
Under UNCLOS, what is the maximum breadth of a coastal State's territorial sea measured from its lawful baselines?
UNCLOS ప్రకారం lawful baselines నుంచి coastal State territorial sea maximum breadth ఎంత?
Explanation:
• UNCLOS Article 3 permits a State to establish a territorial sea up to 12 nautical miles from its lawful baselines.
• Sovereignty extends to the territorial sea, subject to UNCLOS and other rules of international law.
• This is different from the 200-nautical-mile EEZ.
• Sovereignty extends to the territorial sea, subject to UNCLOS and other rules of international law.
• This is different from the 200-nautical-mile EEZ.
వివరణ:
• UNCLOS Article 3 ప్రకారం lawful baselines నుంచి 12 nautical miles వరకు territorial sea establish చేయవచ్చు.
• UNCLOS మరియు other rules of international lawకు subjectగా territorial seaపై sovereignty ఉంటుంది.
• ఇది 200-nautical-mile EEZ నుంచి distinct.
• UNCLOS మరియు other rules of international lawకు subjectగా territorial seaపై sovereignty ఉంటుంది.
• ఇది 200-nautical-mile EEZ నుంచి distinct.
Question 4
ప్రశ్న 4
Under UNCLOS, how far may an Exclusive Economic Zone generally extend from the baselines from which the territorial sea is measured?
UNCLOS ప్రకారం territorial sea measure చేసే baselines నుంచి Exclusive Economic Zone సాధారణంగా ఎంత దూరం వరకు extend కావచ్చు?
Explanation:
• UNCLOS Article 57 provides that an EEZ shall not extend beyond 200 nautical miles from the relevant baselines.
• Within the EEZ, the coastal State has sovereign rights concerning natural resources and specified jurisdictional rights.
• An EEZ is not the same as territorial sea and is not an area of complete coastal-State sovereignty.
• Within the EEZ, the coastal State has sovereign rights concerning natural resources and specified jurisdictional rights.
• An EEZ is not the same as territorial sea and is not an area of complete coastal-State sovereignty.
వివరణ:
• UNCLOS Article 57 ప్రకారం relevant baselines నుంచి EEZ 200 nautical milesకన్నా beyond extend కాకూడదు.
• EEZలో natural resourcesపై coastal Stateకు sovereign rights మరియు specified jurisdictional rights ఉంటాయి.
• EEZ territorial seaతో same కాదు; coastal State complete sovereignty area కూడా కాదు.
• EEZలో natural resourcesపై coastal Stateకు sovereign rights మరియు specified jurisdictional rights ఉంటాయి.
• EEZ territorial seaతో same కాదు; coastal State complete sovereignty area కూడా కాదు.
Question 5
ప్రశ్న 5
Which statement correctly describes navigation rights of other States in a coastal State's Exclusive Economic Zone under UNCLOS?
UNCLOS కింద coastal State Exclusive Economic Zoneలో other States navigation rightsను సరైన విధంగా వివరించే ప్రకటన ఏది?
Explanation:
• UNCLOS Article 58 preserves freedoms of navigation and overflight and other internationally lawful uses related to those freedoms in EEZs.
• Other States must exercise those freedoms with due regard for the coastal State's rights and duties.
• Coastal States simultaneously retain sovereign resource rights in their EEZs.
• Other States must exercise those freedoms with due regard for the coastal State's rights and duties.
• Coastal States simultaneously retain sovereign resource rights in their EEZs.
వివరణ:
• UNCLOS Article 58 EEZలో navigation, overflight మరియు related internationally lawful uses freedomsను preserve చేస్తుంది.
• Other States ఆ freedomsను coastal State rights మరియు dutiesకు due regardతో exercise చేయాలి.
• Coastal Stateకు అదే సమయంలో EEZ natural resourcesపై sovereign rights ఉంటాయి.
• Other States ఆ freedomsను coastal State rights మరియు dutiesకు due regardతో exercise చేయాలి.
• Coastal Stateకు అదే సమయంలో EEZ natural resourcesపై sovereign rights ఉంటాయి.
Question 6
ప్రశ్న 6
What was the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC)?
2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) ఏమిటి?
Explanation:
• ASEAN Member States and China adopted the DOC in Phnom Penh on 4 November 2002.
• It calls for peaceful resolution of disputes, self-restraint, freedom of navigation and confidence-building cooperation.
• It did not settle the underlying sovereignty disputes.
• It calls for peaceful resolution of disputes, self-restraint, freedom of navigation and confidence-building cooperation.
• It did not settle the underlying sovereignty disputes.
వివరణ:
• ASEAN Member States మరియు China DOCను 4 నవంబర్ 2002న Phnom Penhలో adopt చేశాయి.
• Peaceful resolution, self-restraint, freedom of navigation మరియు confidence-building cooperationకు ఇది call చేస్తుంది.
• Underlying sovereignty disputesను ఇది settle చేయలేదు.
• Peaceful resolution, self-restraint, freedom of navigation మరియు confidence-building cooperationకు ఇది call చేస్తుంది.
• Underlying sovereignty disputesను ఇది settle చేయలేదు.
Question 7
ప్రశ్న 7
Which statement correctly describes the ASEAN-China Code of Conduct in the South China Sea (COC) as of September 2026?
సెప్టెంబర్ 2026 నాటికి ASEAN-China Code of Conduct in the South China Sea (COC) statusను సరైన విధంగా వివరించే ప్రకటన ఏది?
Explanation:
• ASEAN sources continued to describe COC negotiations as ongoing in 2026.
• The third reading of the negotiating text had been completed and the text was renamed the Draft COC.
• The continued negotiations mean the 2002 DOC should not be confused with a concluded and legally operative final COC.
• The third reading of the negotiating text had been completed and the text was renamed the Draft COC.
• The continued negotiations mean the 2002 DOC should not be confused with a concluded and legally operative final COC.
వివరణ:
• ASEAN sources 2026లో కూడా COC negotiations ongoingగా ఉన్నాయని పేర్కొన్నాయి.
• Negotiating text third reading complete అయి దాన్ని Draft COCగా rename చేశారు.
• కాబట్టి 2002 DOCను concluded మరియు legally operative final COCతో confuse చేయకూడదు.
• Negotiating text third reading complete అయి దాన్ని Draft COCగా rename చేశారు.
• కాబట్టి 2002 DOCను concluded మరియు legally operative final COCతో confuse చేయకూడదు.
Question 8
ప్రశ్న 8
Which country initiated the South China Sea arbitration against China under Annex VII of UNCLOS in January 2013?
January 2013లో UNCLOS Annex VII కింద Chinaపై South China Sea arbitrationను ఏ country initiate చేసింది?
Explanation:
• The Philippines initiated Annex VII arbitral proceedings against China on 22 January 2013.
• The proceedings concerned interpretation and application of UNCLOS in relation to maritime entitlements and certain activities.
• The final award was issued on 12 July 2016.
• The proceedings concerned interpretation and application of UNCLOS in relation to maritime entitlements and certain activities.
• The final award was issued on 12 July 2016.
వివరణ:
• Philippines 22 జనవరి 2013న Chinaపై Annex VII arbitral proceedings initiate చేసింది.
• Proceedings maritime entitlements మరియు certain activitiesకు సంబంధించి UNCLOS interpretation/applicationపై focus చేశాయి.
• Final award 12 జూలై 2016న issued అయింది.
• Proceedings maritime entitlements మరియు certain activitiesకు సంబంధించి UNCLOS interpretation/applicationపై focus చేశాయి.
• Final award 12 జూలై 2016న issued అయింది.
Question 9
ప్రశ్న 9
Which statement most precisely describes the institutional role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in the 2016 South China Sea case?
2016 South China Sea caseలో Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) institutional roleను అత్యంత preciseగా వివరించే ప్రకటన ఏది?
Explanation:
• The dispute was heard by a five-member arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of UNCLOS.
• The Permanent Court of Arbitration acted as the registry for the proceedings.
• Describing the decision simply as a 'PCA judgment on sovereignty' would therefore be technically inaccurate.
• The Permanent Court of Arbitration acted as the registry for the proceedings.
• Describing the decision simply as a 'PCA judgment on sovereignty' would therefore be technically inaccurate.
వివరణ:
• Disputeను UNCLOS Annex VII కింద constituted five-member arbitral tribunal hear చేసింది.
• Permanent Court of Arbitration proceedingsకు registryగా పనిచేసింది.
• Decisionను simply 'PCA sovereignty judgment'గా describe చేయడం technically inaccurate.
• Permanent Court of Arbitration proceedingsకు registryగా పనిచేసింది.
• Decisionను simply 'PCA sovereignty judgment'గా describe చేయడం technically inaccurate.
Question 10
ప్రశ్న 10
What important jurisdictional limitation did the 2016 South China Sea arbitral tribunal emphasize?
2016 South China Sea arbitral tribunal ఏ important jurisdictional limitationను emphasize చేసింది?
Explanation:
• The tribunal expressly distinguished maritime entitlement questions under UNCLOS from territorial sovereignty and maritime-boundary delimitation.
• It did not determine which State owns disputed land features.
• This distinction is essential when interpreting the legal effect of the award.
• It did not determine which State owns disputed land features.
• This distinction is essential when interpreting the legal effect of the award.
వివరణ:
• Tribunal UNCLOS maritime-entitlement questionsను territorial sovereignty మరియు maritime-boundary delimitation నుంచి expressly distinguish చేసింది.
• Disputed land features ఏ Stateకు చెందుతాయో decide చేయలేదు.
• Award legal effectను interpret చేయడానికి ఈ distinction essential.
• Disputed land features ఏ Stateకు చెందుతాయో decide చేయలేదు.
• Award legal effectను interpret చేయడానికి ఈ distinction essential.
Question 11
ప్రశ్న 11
What did the 2016 tribunal find concerning China's claimed historic rights within the area represented by the 'nine-dash line'?
‘Nine-dash line’గా represented areaలో China's claimed historic rights గురించి 2016 tribunal ఏమి find చేసింది?
Explanation:
• The tribunal found that UNCLOS comprehensively allocates maritime entitlements among States Parties.
• It concluded that China's claimed historic rights within the dashed-line area were without lawful effect insofar as they exceeded rights permitted by UNCLOS.
• China rejects the tribunal's award and has consistently stated that it does not accept or recognize it.
• It concluded that China's claimed historic rights within the dashed-line area were without lawful effect insofar as they exceeded rights permitted by UNCLOS.
• China rejects the tribunal's award and has consistently stated that it does not accept or recognize it.
వివరణ:
• UNCLOS States Parties మధ్య maritime entitlementsను comprehensively allocate చేస్తుందని tribunal found చేసింది.
• Dashed-line areaలో claimed historic rights UNCLOS permit చేసే rightsను exceed చేసే extent వరకు lawful effect లేవని conclude చేసింది.
• China tribunal awardను reject చేసి దాన్ని accept లేదా recognize చేయదని consistently stated చేసింది.
• Dashed-line areaలో claimed historic rights UNCLOS permit చేసే rightsను exceed చేసే extent వరకు lawful effect లేవని conclude చేసింది.
• China tribunal awardను reject చేసి దాన్ని accept లేదా recognize చేయదని consistently stated చేసింది.
Question 12
ప్రశ్న 12
What did the 2016 tribunal conclude about the capacity of naturally occurring high-tide features in the Spratly Islands to generate an Exclusive Economic Zone of their own?
Spratly Islandsలో naturally occurring high-tide features తమ own Exclusive Economic Zone generate చేయగల capacity గురించి 2016 tribunal ఏమి conclude చేసింది?
Explanation:
• Applying UNCLOS Article 121(3), the tribunal examined the natural capacity of the Spratly features rather than conditions created through external support or construction.
• It concluded that none of the high-tide Spratly features qualified to generate an EEZ or continental shelf.
• This finding concerned maritime entitlements, not sovereignty over the features.
• It concluded that none of the high-tide Spratly features qualified to generate an EEZ or continental shelf.
• This finding concerned maritime entitlements, not sovereignty over the features.
వివరణ:
• UNCLOS Article 121(3) apply చేస్తూ tribunal external support లేదా construction వల్ల ఏర్పడిన conditions కాకుండా features natural capacityను examine చేసింది.
• Spratly high-tide featuresలో ఏదీ EEZ లేదా continental shelf generate చేసే qualification పొందదని conclude చేసింది.
• ఈ finding maritime entitlementsకు సంబంధించినది; features sovereigntyకు కాదు.
• Spratly high-tide featuresలో ఏదీ EEZ లేదా continental shelf generate చేసే qualification పొందదని conclude చేసింది.
• ఈ finding maritime entitlementsకు సంబంధించినది; features sovereigntyకు కాదు.
Question 13
ప్రశ్న 13
Which statement correctly reflects the tribunal's findings regarding Mischief Reef and Second Thomas Shoal?
Mischief Reef మరియు Second Thomas Shoal గురించి tribunal findingsను సరైన విధంగా ప్రతిబింబించే ప్రకటన ఏది?
Explanation:
• The tribunal classified Mischief Reef and Second Thomas Shoal as low-tide elevations.
• It found them located within an area where the Philippines possesses EEZ and continental-shelf rights under UNCLOS.
• This was a maritime-entitlement finding and did not amount to a tribunal ruling transferring sovereignty over territory.
• It found them located within an area where the Philippines possesses EEZ and continental-shelf rights under UNCLOS.
• This was a maritime-entitlement finding and did not amount to a tribunal ruling transferring sovereignty over territory.
వివరణ:
• Tribunal Mischief Reef మరియు Second Thomas Shoalను low-tide elevationsగా classify చేసింది.
• UNCLOS కింద Philippinesకు EEZ మరియు continental-shelf rights ఉన్న areaలో అవి ఉన్నాయని find చేసింది.
• ఇది maritime-entitlement finding; territorial sovereignty transfer ruling కాదు.
• UNCLOS కింద Philippinesకు EEZ మరియు continental-shelf rights ఉన్న areaలో అవి ఉన్నాయని find చేసింది.
• ఇది maritime-entitlement finding; territorial sovereignty transfer ruling కాదు.
Question 14
ప్రశ్న 14
Which statement best distinguishes territorial sovereignty, UNCLOS maritime entitlements and actual physical control in the South China Sea?
South China Seaలో territorial sovereignty, UNCLOS maritime entitlements మరియు actual physical control మధ్య distinctionను అత్యంత సరైన విధంగా చూపేది ఏది?
Explanation:
• Physical presence or control is a factual condition and should not automatically be equated with internationally settled sovereignty.
• Maritime entitlements depend on UNCLOS rules concerning coasts and maritime features.
• The 2016 tribunal's deliberate separation of sovereignty from maritime-entitlement questions illustrates this distinction.
• Maritime entitlements depend on UNCLOS rules concerning coasts and maritime features.
• The 2016 tribunal's deliberate separation of sovereignty from maritime-entitlement questions illustrates this distinction.
వివరణ:
• Physical presence లేదా control factual condition; దాన్ని automatically internationally settled sovereigntyతో equate చేయకూడదు.
• Maritime entitlements UNCLOSలో coasts మరియు maritime featuresకు సంబంధించిన rulesపై ఆధారపడతాయి.
• 2016 tribunal sovereigntyను maritime-entitlement questions నుంచి deliberately separate చేయడం ఈ distinctionను illustrate చేస్తుంది.
• Maritime entitlements UNCLOSలో coasts మరియు maritime featuresకు సంబంధించిన rulesపై ఆధారపడతాయి.
• 2016 tribunal sovereigntyను maritime-entitlement questions నుంచి deliberately separate చేయడం ఈ distinctionను illustrate చేస్తుంది.
Question 15
ప్రశ్న 15
Under UNCLOS, what maritime zones can an artificial island created through land reclamation generate solely because of the reclamation?
UNCLOS ప్రకారం land reclamation ద్వారా created artificial island కేవలం reclamation కారణంగా ఏ maritime zones generate చేయగలదు?
Explanation:
• UNCLOS distinguishes naturally formed islands from artificial islands, installations and structures.
• Artificial islands do not possess the legal status of islands and have no territorial sea of their own.
• Land reclamation therefore cannot by itself transform a reef into a feature entitled to a new EEZ.
• Artificial islands do not possess the legal status of islands and have no territorial sea of their own.
• Land reclamation therefore cannot by itself transform a reef into a feature entitled to a new EEZ.
వివరణ:
• UNCLOS naturally formed islandsను artificial islands, installations మరియు structures నుంచి distinguish చేస్తుంది.
• Artificial islandsకు islands legal status ఉండదు మరియు own territorial sea ఉండదు.
• కాబట్టి land reclamation alone reefను new EEZకు entitled featureగా transform చేయదు.
• Artificial islandsకు islands legal status ఉండదు మరియు own territorial sea ఉండదు.
• కాబట్టి land reclamation alone reefను new EEZకు entitled featureగా transform చేయదు.
Question 16
ప్రశ్న 16
Which statement correctly describes the legal status of the 2016 South China Sea arbitral award and China's position toward it?
2016 South China Sea arbitral award legal status మరియు దానిపై China's positionను సరైన విధంగా వివరించే ప్రకటన ఏది?
Explanation:
• UNCLOS provides that an Annex VII award is final and binding upon the parties to the dispute.
• China did not participate in the merits proceedings and has consistently rejected the jurisdiction and award.
• Stating both propositions distinguishes the Convention's legal framework from China's official diplomatic position.
• China did not participate in the merits proceedings and has consistently rejected the jurisdiction and award.
• Stating both propositions distinguishes the Convention's legal framework from China's official diplomatic position.
వివరణ:
• UNCLOS ప్రకారం Annex VII award dispute partiesపై final మరియు binding.
• China merits proceedingsలో participate చేయలేదు మరియు jurisdiction, award రెండింటినీ consistently reject చేసింది.
• ఈ రెండు propositionsను పేర్కొనడం Convention legal framework మరియు China's official diplomatic position మధ్య distinctionను preserve చేస్తుంది.
• China merits proceedingsలో participate చేయలేదు మరియు jurisdiction, award రెండింటినీ consistently reject చేసింది.
• ఈ రెండు propositionsను పేర్కొనడం Convention legal framework మరియు China's official diplomatic position మధ్య distinctionను preserve చేస్తుంది.
Question 17
ప్రశ్న 17
Which principle concerning South China Sea disputes is explicitly included in the 2002 ASEAN-China Declaration on the Conduct of Parties?
2002 ASEAN-China Declaration on the Conduct of Partiesలో South China Sea disputesకు సంబంధించి explicitly included principle ఏది?
Explanation:
• The DOC calls on parties concerned to resolve disputes peacefully through consultations and negotiations.
• It also emphasizes self-restraint and freedom of navigation and overflight.
• The declaration is intended to reduce escalation while disputes remain unresolved.
• It also emphasizes self-restraint and freedom of navigation and overflight.
• The declaration is intended to reduce escalation while disputes remain unresolved.
వివరణ:
• DOC parties concerned disputesను consultations మరియు negotiations ద్వారా peacefully resolve చేయాలని calls చేస్తుంది.
• Self-restraint, freedom of navigation మరియు overflightను కూడా emphasize చేస్తుంది.
• Disputes unresolvedగా ఉన్న సమయంలో escalationను తగ్గించడం declaration objective.
• Self-restraint, freedom of navigation మరియు overflightను కూడా emphasize చేస్తుంది.
• Disputes unresolvedగా ఉన్న సమయంలో escalationను తగ్గించడం declaration objective.
Question 18
ప్రశ్న 18
Why is freedom of navigation in the South China Sea strategically important beyond the claimant parties themselves?
Claimant partiesకే కాకుండా freedom of navigation in the South China Sea ఎందుకు strategically important?
Explanation:
• The South China Sea lies on major maritime routes connecting Northeast and Southeast Asia with the Indian Ocean and markets farther west.
• Consequently, navigation, overflight and maritime stability matter to many States that are not territorial claimants.
• Strategic interest in sea lanes does not itself create a sovereignty claim.
• Consequently, navigation, overflight and maritime stability matter to many States that are not territorial claimants.
• Strategic interest in sea lanes does not itself create a sovereignty claim.
వివరణ:
• South China Sea Northeast మరియు Southeast Asiaను Indian Ocean మరియు farther-west marketsతో connect చేసే major maritime routesపై ఉంది.
• అందువల్ల navigation, overflight మరియు maritime stability territorial claimants కాని అనేక Statesకూ important.
• Sea lanesపై strategic interest ఉండటం sovereignty claimను create చేయదు.
• అందువల్ల navigation, overflight మరియు maritime stability territorial claimants కాని అనేక Statesకూ important.
• Sea lanesపై strategic interest ఉండటం sovereignty claimను create చేయదు.
Question 19
ప్రశ్న 19
Which statement best reflects India's stated approach to the South China Sea?
South China Seaపై India's stated approachను అత్యంత సరైన విధంగా ప్రతిబింబించే ప్రకటన ఏది?
Explanation:
• India is not a territorial claimant in the South China Sea disputes.
• Indian official statements emphasize freedom of navigation and overflight, peaceful dispute settlement and adherence to international law including UNCLOS.
• India has also supported a South China Sea Code of Conduct that is consistent with international law and does not prejudice legitimate rights and interests of other States.
• Indian official statements emphasize freedom of navigation and overflight, peaceful dispute settlement and adherence to international law including UNCLOS.
• India has also supported a South China Sea Code of Conduct that is consistent with international law and does not prejudice legitimate rights and interests of other States.
వివరణ:
• South China Sea disputesలో India territorial claimant కాదు.
• Indian official statements freedom of navigation/overflight, peaceful dispute settlement మరియు international law including UNCLOS adherenceను emphasize చేస్తాయి.
• International lawకు consistentగా ఉండి other States legitimate rights/interestsను prejudice చేయని COCను India support చేసింది.
• Indian official statements freedom of navigation/overflight, peaceful dispute settlement మరియు international law including UNCLOS adherenceను emphasize చేస్తాయి.
• International lawకు consistentగా ఉండి other States legitimate rights/interestsను prejudice చేయని COCను India support చేసింది.
Question 20
ప్రశ్న 20
Which statement best summarizes the legally careful way to interpret competing South China Sea claims?
Competing South China Sea claimsను legally carefulగా interpret చేయడానికి సరైన summary ఏది?
Explanation:
• A claimant's assertion represents that claimant's position and is not automatically a settled legal fact.
• International legal findings may determine specific maritime-entitlement questions without determining sovereignty over land territory.
• Effective or physical control is also a separate factual issue and does not by itself conclusively determine legal title.
• International legal findings may determine specific maritime-entitlement questions without determining sovereignty over land territory.
• Effective or physical control is also a separate factual issue and does not by itself conclusively determine legal title.
వివరణ:
• Claimant assertion ఆ claimant positionను represent చేస్తుంది; అది automatically settled legal fact కాదు.
• International legal findings specific maritime-entitlement questionsను determine చేయవచ్చు కానీ land territory sovereigntyను necessarily decide చేయవు.
• Effective లేదా physical control కూడా separate factual issue; అది alone legal titleను conclusively determine చేయదు.
• International legal findings specific maritime-entitlement questionsను determine చేయవచ్చు కానీ land territory sovereigntyను necessarily decide చేయవు.
• Effective లేదా physical control కూడా separate factual issue; అది alone legal titleను conclusively determine చేయదు.
Answer Key సమాధానాల పట్టిక
-
Question 1 ప్రశ్న 1Answer: A. Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam సమాధానం: A. Brunei, China, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan మరియు Vietnam
-
Question 2 ప్రశ్న 2Answer: C. Indonesia does not claim sovereignty over the Spratly or Paracel groups, but maritime issues have arisen where China's expansive dashed-line claims overlap areas Indonesia regards as part of its EEZ near the Natuna Islands సమాధానం: C. Indonesia Spratly లేదా Paracel groupsపై sovereignty claim చేయదు; అయితే Natuna Islands సమీపంలో Indonesia తన EEZగా భావించే areasతో China's expansive dashed-line claims overlap కావడం వల్ల maritime issues ఏర్పడ్డాయి
-
Question 3 ప్రశ్న 3Answer || సమాధానం: B. 12 nautical miles
-
Question 4 ప్రశ్న 4Answer: D. Up to 200 nautical miles సమాధానం: D. 200 nautical miles వరకు
-
Question 5 ప్రశ్న 5Answer: B. Other States retain freedoms including navigation and overflight, subject to UNCLOS and due regard for the coastal State's rights సమాధానం: B. UNCLOSకు subjectగా మరియు coastal State rightsకు due regardతో other States navigation మరియు overflight వంటి freedomsను retain చేస్తాయి
-
Question 6 ప్రశ్న 6Answer: A. An ASEAN-China political declaration promoting peaceful dispute settlement, self-restraint, freedom of navigation and cooperation సమాధానం: A. Peaceful dispute settlement, self-restraint, freedom of navigation మరియు cooperationను promote చేసే ASEAN-China political declaration
-
Question 7 ప్రశ్న 7Answer: B. Negotiations were still ongoing; the third reading had been completed and the negotiating text renamed 'Draft COC', while ASEAN and China continued seeking an effective and substantive COC consistent with international law including UNCLOS సమాధానం: B. Negotiations ఇంకా ongoingలో ఉన్నాయి; third reading complete అయి negotiating textను 'Draft COC'గా rename చేశారు; international law, including UNCLOSకు consistentగా effective మరియు substantive COC కోసం ASEAN-China process కొనసాగుతోంది
-
Question 8 ప్రశ్న 8Answer: C. The Philippines సమాధానం: C. Philippines
-
Question 9 ప్రశ్న 9Answer: B. An arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of UNCLOS issued the award, while the PCA served as registry and administered the proceedings సమాధానం: B. UNCLOS Annex VII కింద constituted arbitral tribunal awardను issue చేసింది; PCA registryగా వ్యవహరించి proceedingsను administer చేసింది
-
Question 10 ప్రశ్న 10Answer: C. It was addressing UNCLOS maritime-entitlement issues and was not deciding sovereignty over land territory or delimiting a maritime boundary సమాధానం: C. UNCLOS maritime-entitlement issuesను address చేసింది; land territory sovereigntyను decide చేయలేదు మరియు maritime boundaryను delimit చేయలేదు
-
Question 11 ప్రశ్న 11Answer: B. Claims to historic rights had no lawful effect to the extent that they exceeded China's maritime entitlements permitted by UNCLOS సమాధానం: B. UNCLOS permit చేసే China's maritime entitlementsను exceed చేసే extent వరకు claimed historic rightsకు lawful effect లేదని tribunal found చేసింది
-
Question 12 ప్రశ్న 12Answer: B. No high-tide feature in the Spratly Islands was capable, in its natural condition, of sustaining human habitation or an economic life of its own so as to generate an EEZ or continental shelf సమాధానం: B. Spratly Islandsలో ఏ high-tide feature కూడా natural conditionలో human habitation లేదా economic life of its own sustain చేయగలదని tribunal find చేయలేదు; అందువల్ల అవి EEZ లేదా continental shelf generate చేయవు
-
Question 13 ప్రశ్న 13Answer: B. Both were found to be low-tide elevations located within the Philippines' EEZ and continental shelf and incapable of generating maritime zones of their own సమాధానం: B. రెండూ Philippines EEZ మరియు continental shelfలో ఉన్న low-tide elevationsగా find చేయబడి, తమ own maritime zones generate చేయలేవని tribunal concluded చేసింది
-
Question 14 ప్రశ్న 14Answer: C. Sovereignty concerns legal title to land territory, maritime entitlements concern rights generated under the law of the sea, and actual control describes a factual situation; one does not automatically settle the others సమాధానం: C. Sovereignty land territory legal titleకు సంబంధించినది; maritime entitlements law of the sea కింద generated rightsకు సంబంధించినవి; actual control factual situationను describe చేస్తుంది; ఒకటి automatically మిగతావాటిని settle చేయదు
-
Question 15 ప్రశ్న 15Answer: C. No territorial sea or EEZ of its own merely by being an artificial island సమాధానం: C. Artificial islandగా ఉండటం వల్ల మాత్రమే తన own territorial sea లేదా EEZ generate చేయదు
-
Question 16 ప్రశ్న 16Answer: B. Under the UNCLOS Annex VII framework the award is final and binding on the parties, while China has consistently rejected the proceedings and states that it does not accept or recognize the award సమాధానం: B. UNCLOS Annex VII framework కింద award partiesపై final మరియు binding; అయితే China proceedingsను consistently reject చేసి awardను accept లేదా recognize చేయదని states చేస్తుంది
-
Question 17 ప్రశ్న 17Answer: A. Territorial and jurisdictional disputes should be resolved peacefully without resort to the threat or use of force సమాధానం: A. Territorial మరియు jurisdictional disputesను threat లేదా use of forceకు resort కాకుండా peacefully resolve చేయాలి
-
Question 18 ప్రశ్న 18Answer: A. The sea forms part of major shipping routes linking the Indian and Pacific Ocean regions and supports extensive international trade and energy transport సమాధానం: A. ఈ sea Indian మరియు Pacific Ocean regionsను link చేసే major shipping routesలో భాగమై extensive international trade మరియు energy transportకు support చేస్తుంది
-
Question 19 ప్రశ్న 19Answer: B. India supports freedom of navigation and overflight, peaceful resolution of disputes in accordance with international law including UNCLOS, and a Code of Conduct consistent with international law that does not prejudice legitimate rights and interests of third parties సమాధానం: B. India freedom of navigation మరియు overflight, international law including UNCLOSకు అనుగుణమైన peaceful dispute resolution, అలాగే third parties legitimate rights/interestsను prejudice చేయని international-law-consistent Code of Conductను support చేస్తుంది
-
Question 20 ప్రశ్న 20Answer: C. Claims made by parties, legal findings under UNCLOS, and factual control of particular features should be identified separately rather than treated as interchangeable సమాధానం: C. Parties claims, UNCLOS legal findings మరియు particular featuresపై factual controlను separately identify చేయాలి; వాటిని interchangeableగా treat చేయకూడదు
